Tang Neng-yuan, Chen Wei-qing
Department of Gastroenterology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Zhonghua Gan Zang Bing Za Zhi. 2012 Jul;20(7):492-6. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-3418.2012.07.003.
To investigate the levels of lipopolysaccharide binding protein (LBP) in serum and ascites of cirrhotic patients, and determine their diagnostic value for spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP).
Cirrhotic patients were divided into groups according to diagnosis of SBP, ascites without SBP, no ascites. To explore the significance of LBP in clinically suspect SBP cases, the ascites without SBP group was sub-divided into two groups according to the symptoms of abdominal pain or elevated white blood cell (WBC) count, and abdominal pain combined with elevated WBC count. Two control groups were composed of patients with intraperitoneal pus and a group of healthy, non-cirrhotic individuals. The LBP levels in serum and ascites were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The ascites routine, ascites culture and albumin assay were carried out in the Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University. Data between the two groups were compared using the t-test or nonparametric test of independent samples, and the areas under the curve were compared using the Z test. Results The levels of LBP in serum and pus were significantly higher in the intraperitoneal pus group than in the cirrhosis group with ascites (P less than 0.01).
The level of serum LBP was significantly higher in the cirrhosis group with SBP than in the cirrhosis group without SBP but with ascites and the cirrhosis group with no ascites (P less than 0.01). There was no significant difference in the level of ascites LBP in the cirrhosis group with SBP and the cirrhosis group without SBP but with ascites (P more than 0.05). In the clinically suspect cases with SBP, the levels of LBP in serum and ascites were significantly higher than those in the cirrhosis group without SBP but with ascites (228.00 mug/ml vs. 80.95 mug/ml and 22.50 mug/ml vs. 11.45 mug/ml, P less than 0.05). Determination of serum LBP had a higher sensitivity than the determination of ascites LBP or ascites WBC.
Gram-negative bacteria infection in the intra-abdominal cavity causes serum and body fluid levels of LBP to increase significantly. Patients with cirrhosis complicated with SBP have significantly elevated levels of serum LBP. The serum and ascites LBP levels are significantly elevated in SBP patients with suspected clinical diagnosis. Measurements of both the serum LBP and ascites LBP may have diagnostic value for SBP.
探讨肝硬化患者血清及腹水中脂多糖结合蛋白(LBP)水平,及其对自发性细菌性腹膜炎(SBP)的诊断价值。
将肝硬化患者根据SBP诊断情况分为SBP组、无SBP腹水组、无腹水组。为探究LBP在临床疑似SBP病例中的意义,将无SBP腹水组根据是否有腹痛症状或白细胞(WBC)计数升高,以及腹痛合并WBC计数升高分为两组。两个对照组分别由腹腔积脓患者和健康非肝硬化个体组成。采用酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)法测定血清和腹水中的LBP水平。在重庆医科大学附属第二医院进行腹水常规、腹水培养及白蛋白测定。两组间数据比较采用t检验或独立样本非参数检验,曲线下面积比较采用Z检验。结果腹腔积脓组血清及脓液中LBP水平显著高于肝硬化腹水组(P<0.01)。
肝硬化SBP组血清LBP水平显著高于无SBP但有腹水的肝硬化组及无腹水的肝硬化组(P<0.01)。肝硬化SBP组与无SBP但有腹水的肝硬化组腹水中LBP水平差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。在临床疑似SBP病例中,血清及腹水中LBP水平显著高于无SBP但有腹水的肝硬化组(228.00μg/ml比80.95μg/ml,22.50μg/ml比11.45μg/ml,P<0.05)。血清LBP测定的敏感性高于腹水LBP或腹水WBC测定。
腹腔内革兰阴性菌感染导致血清及体液中LBP水平显著升高。肝硬化合并SBP患者血清LBP水平显著升高。临床疑似诊断的SBP患者血清及腹水LBP水平显著升高。血清及腹水LBP测定对SBP可能均有诊断价值。