Department of Physiology, Anatomy & Genetics, University of Oxford, Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PT, UK.
Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2013 Apr;111(2-3):59-65. doi: 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2012.09.004. Epub 2012 Oct 5.
This article explores the relativistic principle that there is no privileged scale of causality in biology to clarify the relationships between genomes and phenotypes. The idea that genetic causes are primary views the genome as a program. Initially, that view was vindicated by the discovery of mutations and knockouts that have large and specific effects on the phenotype. But we now know that these form the minority of cases. Many changes at the genome level are buffered by robust networks of interactions in cells, tissues and organs. The 'differential' view of genetics therefore fails because it is too restrictive. An 'integral' view, using reverse engineering from systems biological models to quantify contributions to function, can solve this problem. The article concludes by showing that far from breaking the supervenience principle, downward causation requires that it should be obeyed.
本文探讨了生物学中不存在因果关系的特权尺度的相对论原理,以阐明基因组和表型之间的关系。遗传原因是主要的观点认为基因组是一个程序。最初,这一观点得到了发现突变和敲除的支持,这些突变和敲除对表型有很大和特定的影响。但我们现在知道,这些只占少数情况。在基因组水平上的许多变化都被细胞、组织和器官中强大的相互作用网络缓冲。因此,遗传学的“差异”观点失败了,因为它太局限了。使用从系统生物学模型进行反向工程来量化对功能的贡献的“整体”观点可以解决这个问题。本文最后通过展示,远非打破依存关系原理,向下因果关系要求它应该被遵守。