Vanboeijen, Intellectual Disability Centre, Assen, The Netherlands.
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2014 Jan;58(1):71-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2012.01631.x. Epub 2012 Oct 10.
Antipsychotics are frequently and often long-term used for challenging behaviour in persons with intellectual disability (ID), but the evidence base for this is meagre. As these agents may cause harmful side effects, discontinuation should be considered. Previous studies regarding discontinuation of long-term used antipsychotics mostly were uncontrolled and involved small numbers. The primary objective was to investigate the effects of controlled discontinuation of antipsychotics prescribed for challenging behaviour. Secondary objectives were to compare the results of two discontinuation time schedules, to compare groups of participants who had and had not achieved complete discontinuation, and to identify patient and medication characteristics that might predict the outcomes. Our hypothesis was that discontinuation of antipsychotics used for behavioural symptoms would not lead to worsening in behaviour.
This was a multi-centre parallel-group study comparing two discontinuation schedules of 14 and 28 weeks. Allocation to the two discontinuation schedules took place in a 1:1 ratio. Antipsychotics were tapered off every 2 or 4 weeks with approximately 12.5% of the initial dosage. Follow-up was 12 weeks after the scheduled complete discontinuation, that is, 26 or 40 weeks after the first dose reduction, respectively. Discontinuation was stopped in case of significant behavioural worsening. Participants were 98 residents with ID of three care providing organisations in the Netherlands, aged 15-66 year, who had used for more than 1 year one or more of the six most frequently prescribed antipsychotics for challenging behaviour. Main outcome measure was the total score of the Aberrant Behaviour Checklist (ABC); also ABC sub-scales were used.
Of 98 participants, 43 achieved complete discontinuation; at follow-up 7 had resumed use of antipsychotics. Mean ABC ratings improved significantly for those who achieved complete discontinuation (directly after discontinuation, P < 0.01 and at follow-up, P = 0.03), and at follow-up (P = 0.03) for those who had not achieved complete discontinuation. Similar results were found with respect to most ABC sub-scales, including the 'irritability' sub-scale. There were no significant differences in improvement of ABC ratings between both discontinuation schedules. Higher ratings of extrapyramidal and autonomic symptoms at baseline were associated with less improvement of behavioural symptoms after discontinuation; higher baseline ABC rating predicted higher odds of incomplete discontinuation.
Discontinuation of antipsychotics prescribed for challenging behaviour in patients with ID is associated with improved behavioural functioning. There is no need to taper off in a time frame longer than 14 weeks.
抗精神病药常用于治疗智力障碍(ID)患者的挑战性行为,且常长期使用,但该治疗的证据基础薄弱。由于这些药物可能会引起有害的副作用,因此应考虑停药。先前关于长期使用的抗精神病药停药的研究大多为非对照研究,且涉及的人数较少。主要目的是研究对照停止使用治疗挑战性行为的抗精神病药的效果。次要目的是比较两种停药时间安排的结果,比较已完成和未完成完全停药的参与者组,并确定可能预测结果的患者和药物特征。我们的假设是,停止使用治疗行为症状的抗精神病药不会导致行为恶化。
这是一项多中心平行组研究,比较了 14 周和 28 周两种停药方案。两种停药方案的分配比例为 1:1。每 2 或 4 周逐渐减少抗精神病药剂量,初始剂量减少约 12.5%。停药后 12 周进行随访,即分别在首次减药后 26 或 40 周进行随访。如果出现明显的行为恶化,停药将停止。参与者为荷兰三家护理机构的 98 名 ID 年龄在 15-66 岁的居民,他们使用了六种最常用于治疗挑战性行为的抗精神病药中的一种或多种,使用时间超过 1 年。主要观察指标是异常行为检查表(ABC)的总分;还使用了 ABC 子量表。
98 名参与者中,43 名完成了完全停药;随访时,7 名恢复使用抗精神病药。完成完全停药的患者 ABC 评分显著改善(停药后即刻,P<0.01;随访时,P=0.03),未完成完全停药的患者在随访时也有所改善(P=0.03)。对于大多数 ABC 子量表,包括“易怒”子量表,也发现了类似的结果。两种停药方案之间 ABC 评分的改善没有显著差异。基线时锥体外系和自主症状评分较高与停药后行为症状改善较少有关;基线 ABC 评分较高预测不完全停药的可能性更高。
停止为 ID 患者的挑战性行为开具抗精神病药与改善行为功能有关。不需要在 14 周以上的时间内逐渐减少药物剂量。