• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与结肠癌指南推荐的淋巴结评估的维持或改善相关的医院特征。

Hospital characteristics associated with maintenance or improvement of guideline-recommended lymph node evaluation for colon cancer.

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78229-3900, USA.

出版信息

Med Care. 2013 Jan;51(1):60-7. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318270ba0d.

DOI:10.1097/MLR.0b013e318270ba0d
PMID:23047124
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Over the past 20 years, surgical practice organizations have recommended the identification of ≥12 lymph nodes from surgically treated colon cancer patients as an indicator of quality performance for adequate staging; however, studies suggest that significant variation exists among hospitals in their level of adherence to this recommendation. We examined hospital-level factors that were associated with institutional improvement or maintenance of adequate lymph node evaluation after the introduction of surgical quality guidelines.

RESEARCH DESIGN

Using the 1996-2007 SEER-Medicare data, we evaluated hospital characteristics associated with short-term (1999-2001), medium-term (2002-2004), and long-term (2005-2007) guideline-recommended (≥12) lymph node evaluation compared with initial evaluation levels (1996-1998) using χ tests and multivariate logistic regression analysis, adjusting for patient case-mix.

RESULTS

We identified 228 hospitals that performed ≥6 colon cancer surgeries during each study period from 1996-2007. In the initial study period (1996-1998), 26.3% (n=60) of hospitals were performing guideline-recommended evaluation, which increased to 28.1% in 1999-2001, 44.7% in 2002-2004, and 70.6% in 2005-2007. In multivariate analyses, a hospital's prior guideline performance [odds ratio (OR) (95% confidence interval (CI)): 4.02 (1.92, 8.42)], teaching status [OR (95% CI): 2.33 (1.03, 5.28)], and American College of Surgeon's Oncology Group membership [OR (95% CI): 3.39 (1.39, 8.31)] were significantly associated with short-term guideline-recommended lymph node evaluation. Prior hospital performance [OR (95% CI): 2.41 (1.17, 4.94)], urban location [OR (95% CI): 2.66 (1.12, 6.31)], and American College of Surgeon's Oncology Group membership [OR (95% CI): 6.05 (2.32, 15.77)] were associated with medium-term performance; however, these factors were not associated with long-term performance.

CONCLUSIONS

Over the 12-year period, there were marked improvements in hospital performance for guideline-recommended lymph node evaluation. Understanding patterns in improvement over time contributes to debates over optimal designs of quality-improvement programs.

摘要

背景

在过去的 20 年中,外科实践组织建议从接受手术治疗的结肠癌患者中识别出≥12 个淋巴结,作为充分分期的质量表现指标;然而,研究表明,医院在遵守这一建议的水平上存在显著差异。我们研究了与外科质量指南引入后机构改进或维持适当淋巴结评估相关的医院水平因素。

研究设计

利用 1996-2007 年 SEER-医疗保险数据,我们使用 χ 检验和多变量逻辑回归分析,评估了与初始评估水平(1996-1998 年)相比,短期(1999-2001 年)、中期(2002-2004 年)和长期(2005-2007 年)指南推荐(≥12 个)淋巴结评估相关的医院特征,调整了患者病例组合。

结果

我们确定了 1996-2007 年期间每个研究期间进行≥6 例结肠癌手术的 228 家医院。在初始研究期间(1996-1998 年),26.3%(n=60)的医院进行了指南推荐的评估,到 1999-2001 年增加到 28.1%,2002-2004 年增加到 44.7%,2005-2007 年增加到 70.6%。多变量分析显示,医院既往指南执行情况[比值比(OR)(95%置信区间(CI)):4.02(1.92,8.42)]、教学地位[OR(95%CI):2.33(1.03,5.28)]和美国外科医师学会肿瘤学组成员[OR(95%CI):3.39(1.39,8.31)]与短期指南推荐的淋巴结评估显著相关。既往医院绩效[OR(95%CI):2.41(1.17,4.94)]、城市位置[OR(95%CI):2.66(1.12,6.31)]和美国外科医师学会肿瘤学组成员[OR(95%CI):6.05(2.32,15.77)]与中期表现相关;然而,这些因素与长期表现无关。

结论

在 12 年期间,医院在指南推荐的淋巴结评估方面的表现有了显著提高。了解随时间改进的模式有助于围绕质量改进计划的最佳设计展开辩论。

相似文献

1
Hospital characteristics associated with maintenance or improvement of guideline-recommended lymph node evaluation for colon cancer.与结肠癌指南推荐的淋巴结评估的维持或改善相关的医院特征。
Med Care. 2013 Jan;51(1):60-7. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318270ba0d.
2
Quality of care along the cancer continuum: does receiving adequate lymph node evaluation for colon cancer lead to comprehensive postsurgical care?癌症连续护理质量:接受充分的结肠癌淋巴结评估是否会导致全面的术后护理?
J Am Coll Surg. 2012 Sep;215(3):400-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.05.014. Epub 2012 Jun 8.
3
Hospital lymph node examination rates and survival after resection for colon cancer.医院对结肠癌切除术后的淋巴结检查率及生存率
JAMA. 2007 Nov 14;298(18):2149-54. doi: 10.1001/jama.298.18.2149.
4
Disparities and trends in sentinel lymph node biopsy among early-stage breast cancer patients (1998-2005).早期乳腺癌患者前哨淋巴结活检的差异与趋势(1998 - 2005年)
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008 Apr 2;100(7):462-74. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djn057. Epub 2008 Mar 25.
5
Lymph node evaluation in colorectal cancer patients: a population-based study.结直肠癌患者的淋巴结评估:一项基于人群的研究。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005 Feb 2;97(3):219-25. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dji020.
6
Do hospital attributes predict guideline-recommended gastric cancer care in the United States?医院特征能否预测美国推荐的胃癌治疗指南?
Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Feb;19(2):365-72. doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-1973-z. Epub 2011 Aug 12.
7
Hospital lymph node counts and survival after radical cystectomy.根治性膀胱切除术后的医院淋巴结计数与生存率
Cancer. 2008 Feb 15;112(4):806-12. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23234.
8
Population-based assessment of surgical treatment trends for patients with melanoma in the era of sentinel lymph node biopsy.在前哨淋巴结活检时代,基于人群的黑色素瘤患者手术治疗趋势评估。
J Clin Oncol. 2005 Sep 1;23(25):6054-62. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.21.360.
9
Disparities in quality of care for colon cancer between hospitals in the Netherlands.荷兰医院间结肠癌治疗质量的差异。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2010 Sep;36 Suppl 1:S64-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2010.05.026.
10
Variation in lymph node examination after esophagectomy for cancer in the United States.美国食管癌切除术后淋巴结检查的差异。
Arch Surg. 2012 Jun;147(6):505-11. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2011.2215.

引用本文的文献

1
Mapping evidence on standards and quality of care for older persons in long-term care facilities: a scoping review protocol.长期护理机构中老年人护理标准与质量的证据映射:一项范围综述方案
Syst Rev. 2021 May 22;10(1):153. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01709-2.
2
Medical Oncologists' Experiences in Using Genomic Testing for Lung and Colorectal Cancer Care.肿瘤内科医生在肺癌和结直肠癌治疗中使用基因检测的经验。
J Oncol Pract. 2017 Mar;13(3):e185-e196. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2016.016659. Epub 2017 Jan 17.
3
Who does it first? The uptake of medical innovations in the performance of thrombolysis on ischemic stroke patients in Germany: a study based on hospital quality data.
谁率先开展?德国缺血性中风患者溶栓治疗中医疗创新的应用:一项基于医院质量数据的研究。
Implement Sci. 2015 Jan 13;10:10. doi: 10.1186/s13012-014-0196-7.
4
Hospital variation in sphincter preservation for elderly rectal cancer patients.老年直肠癌患者保括约肌治疗的医院差异
J Surg Res. 2014 Sep;191(1):161-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2014.03.047. Epub 2014 Mar 22.