Suppr超能文献

对于对米氮平或安慰剂无反应的广泛性社交焦虑症患者,使用帕罗西汀增效治疗。

Paroxetine augmentation in patients with generalised social anxiety disorder, non-responsive to mirtazapine or placebo.

作者信息

Schutters Sara I J, van Megen Harold J G M, Van Veen J Frederieke, Schruers Koen R J, Westenberg Herman G M

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, University Medical Centre Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Hum Psychopharmacol. 2011 Jan;26(1):72-6. doi: 10.1002/hup.1165. Epub 2011 Feb 9.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study was to investigate if combination of mirtazapine with paroxetine causes a greater therapeutic effect and less sexual side effects than paroxetine monotherapy in social anxiety disorder (SAD).

METHODS

Twenty one patients with generalised SAD, non-responsive to a 12 week trial with mirtazapine and 22 patients, non-responsive to placebo received paroxetine (20-40 mg) in addition to their double-blind treatment with mirtazapine or placebo for another 12 weeks. The Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (LSAS) and the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) scale were used to measure efficacy. Sexual functioning was assessed by the Arizona Sexual Experiences Scale (ASEX).

RESULTS

Both treatments showed a significant LSAS reduction and their response rates (based on LSAS reduction ≥ 40% and CGI-I ≤ 2) were similar (paroxetine and mirtazapine: 52.4%, paroxetine and placebo: 59.1%). Sexual dysfunction (based on ASEX ≥ 19) was found in half of patients treated with paroxetine and placebo, and in 38% of patients treated with paroxetine and mirtazapine.

CONCLUSION

The present study did not find support for a greater efficacy of combination pharmacotherapy in SAD, however results suggest that combination of paroxetine with mirtazapine might cause less sexual dysfunction than treatment with paroxetine alone.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在调查米氮平与帕罗西汀联合使用在社交焦虑障碍(SAD)中是否比单用帕罗西汀具有更大的治疗效果和更少的性功能副作用。

方法

21例对米氮平12周试验无反应的广泛性SAD患者以及22例对安慰剂无反应的患者,在双盲接受米氮平或安慰剂治疗的基础上,加用帕罗西汀(20 - 40mg)再治疗12周。使用利博维茨社交焦虑量表(LSAS)和临床总体印象改善量表(CGI - I)来衡量疗效。通过亚利桑那性体验量表(ASEX)评估性功能。

结果

两种治疗方法均使LSAS显著降低,且它们的有效率(基于LSAS降低≥40%和CGI - I≤2)相似(帕罗西汀和米氮平:52.4%,帕罗西汀和安慰剂:59.1%)。在接受帕罗西汀和安慰剂治疗的患者中,一半出现性功能障碍(基于ASEX≥19),在接受帕罗西汀和米氮平治疗的患者中,这一比例为38%。

结论

本研究未发现联合药物治疗在SAD中具有更大疗效的证据,然而结果表明,与单用帕罗西汀相比,帕罗西汀与米氮平联合使用可能导致更少的性功能障碍。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验