Schutters Sara I J, van Megen Harold J G M, Van Veen J Frederieke, Schruers Koen R J, Westenberg Herman G M
Department of Psychiatry, University Medical Centre Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Hum Psychopharmacol. 2011 Jan;26(1):72-6. doi: 10.1002/hup.1165. Epub 2011 Feb 9.
The aim of the study was to investigate if combination of mirtazapine with paroxetine causes a greater therapeutic effect and less sexual side effects than paroxetine monotherapy in social anxiety disorder (SAD).
Twenty one patients with generalised SAD, non-responsive to a 12 week trial with mirtazapine and 22 patients, non-responsive to placebo received paroxetine (20-40 mg) in addition to their double-blind treatment with mirtazapine or placebo for another 12 weeks. The Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (LSAS) and the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) scale were used to measure efficacy. Sexual functioning was assessed by the Arizona Sexual Experiences Scale (ASEX).
Both treatments showed a significant LSAS reduction and their response rates (based on LSAS reduction ≥ 40% and CGI-I ≤ 2) were similar (paroxetine and mirtazapine: 52.4%, paroxetine and placebo: 59.1%). Sexual dysfunction (based on ASEX ≥ 19) was found in half of patients treated with paroxetine and placebo, and in 38% of patients treated with paroxetine and mirtazapine.
The present study did not find support for a greater efficacy of combination pharmacotherapy in SAD, however results suggest that combination of paroxetine with mirtazapine might cause less sexual dysfunction than treatment with paroxetine alone.
本研究旨在调查米氮平与帕罗西汀联合使用在社交焦虑障碍(SAD)中是否比单用帕罗西汀具有更大的治疗效果和更少的性功能副作用。
21例对米氮平12周试验无反应的广泛性SAD患者以及22例对安慰剂无反应的患者,在双盲接受米氮平或安慰剂治疗的基础上,加用帕罗西汀(20 - 40mg)再治疗12周。使用利博维茨社交焦虑量表(LSAS)和临床总体印象改善量表(CGI - I)来衡量疗效。通过亚利桑那性体验量表(ASEX)评估性功能。
两种治疗方法均使LSAS显著降低,且它们的有效率(基于LSAS降低≥40%和CGI - I≤2)相似(帕罗西汀和米氮平:52.4%,帕罗西汀和安慰剂:59.1%)。在接受帕罗西汀和安慰剂治疗的患者中,一半出现性功能障碍(基于ASEX≥19),在接受帕罗西汀和米氮平治疗的患者中,这一比例为38%。
本研究未发现联合药物治疗在SAD中具有更大疗效的证据,然而结果表明,与单用帕罗西汀相比,帕罗西汀与米氮平联合使用可能导致更少的性功能障碍。