Jones Barbara E, Stokes Suzy, McKenzie Suzi, Nilles Eric, Stoddard Gregory J
Department of Pulmonary/Critical Care Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, USA.
Wilderness Environ Med. 2013 Mar;24(1):32-6. doi: 10.1016/j.wem.2012.07.004. Epub 2012 Oct 10.
The purpose of this study was to review the patient characteristics and management of 56 cases of high altitude pulmonary edema at the Pheriche Himalayan Rescue Association Medical Aid Post, and to measure the use of medications in addition to descent and oxygen.
In a retrospective case series, we reviewed all patients diagnosed clinically with high altitude pulmonary edema during the 2010 Spring and Fall seasons. Nationality, altitude at onset of symptoms, physical examination findings, therapies administered, and evacuation methods were evaluated.
Of all patients, 23% were Nepalese, with no difference in clinical features compared with non-Nepalese patients; 28% of all patients were also suspected of having high altitude cerebral edema. Symptoms developed in 91% of all patients at an altitude higher than the aid post (median altitude of onset of 4834 m); 83% received oxygen therapy, and 87% received nifedipine, 44% sildenafil, 32% dexamethasone, and 39% acetazolamide. Patients who were administered sildenafil, dexamethasone, or acetazolamide had presented with significantly lower initial oxygen saturations (P ≤ .05). After treatment, 93% of all patients descended; 38% descended on foot without a supply of oxygen.
A significant number of patients presenting to the Pheriche medical aid post with high altitude pulmonary edema were given dexamethasone, sildenafil, or acetazolamide in addition to oxygen, nifedipine, and descent. This finding may be related to perceived severity of illness and evacuation limitations. Although no adverse effects were observed, the use of multiple medications is not supported by current evidence and should not be widely adopted without further study.
本研究旨在回顾在费里切喜马拉雅救援协会医疗救助站收治的56例高原肺水肿患者的特征及治疗情况,并测定除下山和吸氧外药物的使用情况。
在一项回顾性病例系列研究中,我们回顾了2010年春秋两季临床诊断为高原肺水肿的所有患者。评估了患者的国籍、症状出现时的海拔、体格检查结果、所采用的治疗方法以及后送方式。
所有患者中,23%为尼泊尔人,与非尼泊尔患者相比临床特征无差异;所有患者中有28%还疑似患有高原脑水肿。91%的患者在高于救助站的海拔处出现症状(症状出现的中位海拔为4834米);83%的患者接受了氧疗,87%的患者接受了硝苯地平治疗,44%的患者接受了西地那非治疗,32%的患者接受了地塞米松治疗,39%的患者接受了乙酰唑胺治疗。接受西地那非、地塞米松或乙酰唑胺治疗的患者初始血氧饱和度显著较低(P≤0.05)。治疗后,93%的患者下山;38%的患者徒步下山且未吸氧。
大量因高原肺水肿到费里切医疗救助站就诊的患者,除吸氧、硝苯地平和下山治疗外,还接受了地塞米松、西地那非或乙酰唑胺治疗。这一发现可能与对疾病严重程度的认知和后送限制有关。尽管未观察到不良反应,但目前证据不支持使用多种药物,未经进一步研究不应广泛采用。