Suppr超能文献

保存型和无防腐剂型氟喹诺酮滴眼液的污染率比较。

Comparison of contamination rates between preserved and preservative-free fluoroquinolone eyedrops.

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, National Cancer Center, Goyang, South Korea.

出版信息

Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2013 Mar;251(3):817-24. doi: 10.1007/s00417-012-2152-z. Epub 2012 Oct 12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the antimicrobial effectiveness of preservative-free fluoroquinolone products compared with benzalkonium chloride containing fluoroquinolones using the challenge test provided by the United States Pharmacopeia (USP) and the in-use test.

METHODS

  1. Challenge test: to compare the growth of microorganisms between different fluoroquinolone preparations, four test organisms, including Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Candida albicans, and Aspergillus niger were chosen among five microorganisms listed by USP 2004. The inoculated products were sampled for microbial survivors at days 7, 14, and 28 following initial inoculation at room temperature. The number of surviving organisms were calculated as a Log10 reduction from the original inocula. 2. In-use test: a total of 100 bottles were collected after instillation of preservative-free fluoroquinolone eyedrops in volunteer patients after 1 week of use. The remaining fluid and tips of the bottles were cultured. Colonies on the plates were counted at the end of the incubation period. All microorganisms were identified by Gram staining and biochemical assays.

RESULTS

  1. Challenge test: preservative-free gatifloxacin and levofloxacin demonstrated a lower log reduction against A. niger than preserved fluoroquinolones and preservative-free moxifloxacin at all time points. 2. In-use test: There was no contamination identified on plates inoculated by preservative-free quinolone bottles after 1 week of use in this study.

CONCLUSIONS

Physicians should be aware of the lower antifungal preservative effectiveness of some preservative-free fluoroquinolone preparations than preserved ones.

摘要

背景

通过美国药典(USP)提供的挑战试验和使用中试验,评估不含防腐剂的氟喹诺酮产品与含苯扎氯铵的氟喹诺酮相比的抗菌效果。

方法

  1. 挑战试验:为了比较不同氟喹诺酮制剂之间微生物的生长情况,从 USP 2004 中列出的五种微生物中选择了四种测试生物体,包括金黄色葡萄球菌、铜绿假单胞菌、白色念珠菌和黑曲霉。在室温下初始接种后第 7、14 和 28 天,对接种产品进行微生物存活采样。将存活的微生物数量计算为原始接种物的对数减少。2. 使用中试验:在志愿者患者使用无防腐剂氟喹诺酮滴眼剂一周后,共收集了 100 瓶。对剩余的液体和瓶子的尖端进行培养。培养期结束时,对平板上的菌落进行计数。所有微生物均通过革兰氏染色和生化试验进行鉴定。

结果

  1. 挑战试验:在所有时间点,无防腐剂加替沙星和左氧氟沙星对黑曲霉的对数减少均低于含防腐剂的氟喹诺酮和无防腐剂莫西沙星。2. 使用中试验:在这项研究中,使用一周后,无防腐剂喹诺酮瓶接种的平板上未发现污染。

结论

医生应注意一些无防腐剂的氟喹诺酮制剂的抗真菌防腐剂效果低于含防腐剂的制剂。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验