• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经桡动脉途径失败后,经尺动脉入路作为冠状动脉介入治疗的一种替代入路方法。

Transulnar approach as an alternative access site for coronary invasive procedures after transradial approach failure.

机构信息

Santa Casa de Marília, Marília, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

Am Heart J. 2012 Oct;164(4):462-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2012.08.001.

DOI:10.1016/j.ahj.2012.08.001
PMID:23067902
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Unsuccessful radial artery puncture, inability to advance the guide catheter to the ascending aorta, and inadequate guide catheter support represent mechanisms of transradial approach failure. With the rationale of sharing the same efficacy and safety promoted by radial access, the transulnar approach represents an alternative access site for percutaneous coronary procedures.

METHODS

Between May 2007 and May 2012, 11,059 coronary invasive procedures were performed in a single institution: 10,108 by transradial approach (91.4%), 541 by transfemoral approach (4.9%), and 410 by transulnar approach (3.7%). Patients who underwent coronary procedures through transulnar access were included in a prospective registry of effectiveness and safety.

RESULTS

Diagnostic procedures accounted for 71.8% of cases, and the right ulnar access was the most common route (88.9%). Procedure success was high (98.5%), with a crossover rate of 1.5% (6 cases), of which 5 were achieved through the contralateral radial access and 1 through femoral approach. Complications related to access site were low (3.9%), consisting mostly of minor bleeding due to subcutaneous hematomas. There were no cases of major bleeding, nerve injury, pseudoaneurysm, arteriovenous fistula, or necessity of vascular surgical repair.

CONCLUSIONS

The transulnar approach represents an alternative to the transradial approach in selected cases when performed by radial-trained operators, sharing a high success rate and extremely low incidence of access-site complications.

摘要

背景

桡动脉穿刺失败、导引导管无法进入升主动脉以及导引导管支撑不足是经桡动脉入路失败的机制。基于桡动脉入路的相同疗效和安全性,经尺动脉入路是经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的另一种入路选择。

方法

在一家机构中,2007 年 5 月至 2012 年 5 月期间共进行了 11059 例冠状动脉介入治疗:10108 例经桡动脉入路(91.4%),541 例经股动脉入路(4.9%),410 例经尺动脉入路(3.7%)。接受经尺动脉入路冠状动脉介入治疗的患者被纳入有效性和安全性的前瞻性登记研究。

结果

诊断性操作占 71.8%,右侧尺动脉入路最常见(88.9%)。手术成功率高(98.5%),交叉率为 1.5%(6 例),其中 5 例通过对侧桡动脉入路,1 例通过股动脉入路实现。与入路部位相关的并发症发生率低(3.9%),主要为皮下血肿引起的轻微出血。无大出血、神经损伤、假性动脉瘤、动静脉瘘或需要血管外科修复的病例。

结论

经桡动脉入路培训的术者进行经尺动脉入路是桡动脉入路的一种替代方法,成功率高,且并发症发生率极低。

相似文献

1
Transulnar approach as an alternative access site for coronary invasive procedures after transradial approach failure.经桡动脉途径失败后,经尺动脉入路作为冠状动脉介入治疗的一种替代入路方法。
Am Heart J. 2012 Oct;164(4):462-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2012.08.001.
2
Transulnar compared with transradial artery approach as a default strategy for coronary procedures: a randomized trial. The Transulnar or Transradial Instead of Coronary Transfemoral Angiographies Study (the AURA of ARTEMIS Study).经桡动脉入路与经尺动脉入路作为冠状动脉介入治疗的默认策略比较:一项随机试验。经桡动脉或经尺动脉入路而非经股动脉冠状动脉造影术研究(ARTEMIS 研究的 AURA)。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Jun;6(3):252-61. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.112.000150. Epub 2013 Jun 4.
3
Safety and feasibility of transulnar catheterization when ipsilateral radial access is not available.当同侧桡动脉入路不可用时,经尺动脉入路的安全性和可行性。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Jan 1;83(1):E51-60. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25123. Epub 2013 Aug 5.
4
Ulnar artery as access site for cardiac catheterization: anatomical considerations.尺动脉作为心脏导管插入术的穿刺部位:解剖学考量
J Interv Cardiol. 2008 Feb;21(1):56-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8183.2007.00314.x. Epub 2007 Dec 11.
5
Efficacy and safety of transulnar coronary angiography and interventions--a single center experience.经尺动脉冠状动脉造影和介入治疗的疗效和安全性——单中心经验。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Jan 1;83(1):E26-31. doi: 10.1002/ccd.24989. Epub 2013 Jun 10.
6
Transulnar artery approach for percutaneous coronary intervention: an alternative route in a patient with challenging transfemoral access and hypoplastic radial artery.经尺动脉入路行冠状动脉介入治疗:在经股动脉入路困难和尺动脉发育不良的患者中的另一种选择。
Singapore Med J. 2010 May;51(5):e81-4.
7
Safety and efficacy of transulnar approach for coronary angiography and intervention.经尺动脉入路行冠状动脉造影和介入治疗的安全性和有效性。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2010 Jul;123(13):1774-9.
8
Transulnar versus transradial access for coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.经尺动脉与经桡动脉途径用于冠状动脉造影或经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Apr;87(5):857-65. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26221. Epub 2015 Sep 2.
9
The transulnar approach for coronary intervention: a safe alternative to transradial approach in selected patients.冠状动脉介入治疗的经尺动脉途径:特定患者经桡动脉途径的安全替代方案。
J Invasive Cardiol. 2005 Feb;17(2):77-9.
10
Transitioning to the radial artery as the preferred access site for cardiac catheterization: an academic medical center experience.从股动脉向桡动脉过渡作为心脏导管插入术的首选入路:一家学术医疗中心的经验。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Aug 1;80(2):247-57. doi: 10.1002/ccd.23387. Epub 2011 Dec 12.

引用本文的文献

1
The Impact of Using a Larger Forearm Artery for Percutaneous Coronary Interventions on Hand Strength: A Randomized Controlled Trial.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中使用较大前臂动脉对手部力量的影响:一项随机对照试验。
J Clin Med. 2021 Mar 6;10(5):1099. doi: 10.3390/jcm10051099.
2
TransRadial versus transUlnar artery approach for elective invasive percutaneous coronary interventions: a randomized trial on the feasibility and safety with ultrasonographic outcome - RAUL study.经桡动脉与经尺动脉途径用于择期侵入性经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:一项关于超声检查结果的可行性和安全性的随机试验——RAUL研究
Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej. 2020 Dec;16(4):376-383. doi: 10.5114/aic.2020.101761. Epub 2020 Dec 29.
3
Impact of the Use of a Larger Forearm Artery on the Efficacy and Safety of Transradial and Transulnar Access: A Randomized Trial with Preprocedural Ultrasonography.
使用较大前臂动脉对桡动脉和尺动脉入路有效性及安全性的影响:一项术前超声检查的随机试验
J Clin Med. 2020 Nov 9;9(11):3607. doi: 10.3390/jcm9113607.
4
Avoiding peripheral nerve injury in arterial interventions.避免动脉介入治疗中的周围神经损伤。
Diagn Interv Radiol. 2019 Sep;25(5):380-391. doi: 10.5152/dir.2019.18296.
5
The Role of the Transradial Approach for Complex Coronary Interventions in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome.经桡动脉途径在急性冠状动脉综合征患者复杂冠状动脉介入治疗中的作用
Interv Cardiol. 2013 Aug;8(2):81-86. doi: 10.15420/icr.2013.8.2.81.
6
Radial Artery and Ulnar Artery Occlusions Following Coronary Procedures and the Impact of Anticoagulation: (Radial and Ulnar ry Occlusion eta-Analys) Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.冠状动脉介入术后桡动脉和尺动脉闭塞及抗凝的影响:(桡动脉和尺动脉闭塞eta 分析)系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Aug 23;6(8):e005430. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.005430.
7
Percutaneous trans-ulnar artery approach for coronary angiography and angioplasty; A case series study.经皮尺动脉途径用于冠状动脉造影和血管成形术;一项病例系列研究。
ARYA Atheroscler. 2015 Sep;11(5):305-9.
8
Procedural and clinical utility of transulnar approach for coronary procedures following failure of radial route: Single centre experience.桡动脉途径失败后经尺动脉途径用于冠状动脉手术的操作及临床效用:单中心经验
J Saudi Heart Assoc. 2014 Jul;26(3):138-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jsha.2014.01.003. Epub 2014 Feb 6.
9
Forearm approach for percutaneous coronary procedures.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的前臂入路
Acta Inform Med. 2013 Dec;21(4):283-7. doi: 10.5455/aim.2013.21.283-287. Epub 2013 Dec 4.