Suppr超能文献

评估血液恶性肿瘤患者同时接受应激性溃疡预防治疗时,使用泊沙康唑替代预防方案的效果。

Evaluation of an alternative posaconazole prophylaxis regimen in haematological malignancy patients receiving concomitant stress ulcer prophylaxis.

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy Services, West Virginia University Healthcare, Morgantown, WV, USA.

出版信息

Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2012 Dec;40(6):557-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2012.09.001. Epub 2012 Oct 12.

Abstract

Posaconazole (PCZ) is approved for fungal prophylaxis in high-risk neutropenic patients. Unfortunately, PCZ oral absorption is affected by nutritional intake and drug interactions with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and possibly histamine-2 antagonists (H2As). Cancer patients frequently receive stress ulcer prophylaxis (SUP) with PPIs or H2As. Recommended PCZ steady-state concentrations (C(ss)) are difficult to achieve using the traditional dosing regimen of 200 mg thrice daily. Given the paucity of guidance on PCZ dosing in patients receiving SUP, this study evaluated attainment of targeted PCZ C(ss) (0.5 μg/mL and 0.7 μg/mL) with two different PCZ dosing regimens when SUP was given. Twenty patients received the traditional dosing and 34 patients received 400 mg twice daily. Median PCZ C(ss) levels were 0.37 μg/mL and 0.32 μg/mL with the traditional and 400 mg twice-daily regimens, respectively (P=0.809). When stratified by type of SUP, H2A patients had a median PCZ C(ss) of 0.39 μg/mL, whereas PPI patients had a median PCZ C(ss) of 0.32 μg/mL. Despite having more patients with PCZ C(ss) >0.5 μg/mL in the H2A group, a statistical significance was not found (P=0.368). Multiple logistic regression did show that increasing age [odds ratio (OR)=1.08, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03-1.19] and use of H2As over PPIs (OR=6.8, 95% CI 1.22-55.16] was associated with PCZ target attainment. These results suggest that PCZ target attainment is similar with either PCZ regimen but that there may be less of an interaction with H2As compared with PPIs.

摘要

泊沙康唑(PCZ)获批用于高危中性粒细胞减少症患者的真菌预防。不幸的是,PCZ 的口服吸收受营养摄入和与质子泵抑制剂(PPIs)及可能的组胺-2 拮抗剂(H2As)的药物相互作用的影响。癌症患者经常接受质子泵抑制剂或 H2As 进行应激性溃疡预防(SUP)。使用传统的每日 200mg 三次的给药方案,很难达到推荐的 PCZ 稳态浓度(C(ss))。鉴于在接受 SUP 的患者中,PCZ 给药的指导很少,本研究评估了在给予 SUP 时,两种不同的 PCZ 给药方案达到目标 PCZ C(ss)(0.5μg/mL 和 0.7μg/mL)的情况。20 名患者接受传统给药方案,34 名患者接受每日两次 400mg 给药方案。传统方案和每日两次 400mg 方案的中位 PCZ C(ss)水平分别为 0.37μg/mL 和 0.32μg/mL(P=0.809)。按 SUP 类型分层,H2A 患者的中位 PCZ C(ss)为 0.39μg/mL,而 PPI 患者的中位 PCZ C(ss)为 0.32μg/mL。尽管 H2A 组中有更多患者的 PCZ C(ss)>0.5μg/mL,但未发现统计学意义(P=0.368)。多变量逻辑回归确实表明,年龄增加[比值比(OR)=1.08,95%置信区间(CI)1.03-1.19]和使用 H2A 而非 PPI(OR=6.8,95%CI 1.22-55.16]与 PCZ 目标达标相关。这些结果表明,两种 PCZ 方案的 PCZ 目标达标情况相似,但与 PPI 相比,与 H2A 的相互作用可能较少。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验