Department of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, Neurological Institute of New Jersey, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey - New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey 07103, USA.
Laryngoscope. 2012 Dec;122(12):2652-7. doi: 10.1002/lary.23539. Epub 2012 Oct 15.
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: The endoscopic endonasal transcribriform approach (EETA) is a viable alternative option for resection of selected anterior skull base (ASB) tumors. However, this technique results in the creation of large cribriform defects. Some have reported the use of a rigid substitute for ASB reconstruction to prevent postoperative frontal lobe sagging. We evaluate the degree of frontal lobe sagging using our triple-layer technique [fascia lata, acellular dermal allograft, and pedicled nasoseptal flap (PNSF)] without the use of rigid structural reconstruction for large cribriform defects.
Retrospective analysis.
Nine patients underwent an EETA for resection of large ASB tumors from August 2010 to November 2011. The degree of frontal lobe displacement after EETA, defined as the ASB position, was calculated based on the most inferior position of the frontal lobe relative to the nasion-sellar line defined on preoperative and postoperative imaging. A positive value signified upward displacement, and a negative value represented inferior displacement of the frontal lobe.
The average cribriform defect size was 9.3 cm(2) (range, 5.0-13.8 cm(2) ). The average distance of postoperative frontal lobe displacement was 0.2 mm (range, -3.9 to 2.9 mm) without any cases of significant brain sagging. The mean follow-up period was 10.1 months (range, 4-19 months). There were no postoperative CSF leaks.
Rigid structural repair may not be necessary for ASB defect repair after endoscopic endonasal resection of the cribriform plate. Our technique for multilayer cranial base reconstruction appears to be satisfactory in preventing delayed frontal lobe sagging.
目的/假设:经鼻内镜颅底前份切除术(EETA)是切除部分颅前窝底(ASB)肿瘤的可行替代方案。然而,该技术会导致筛板大的缺损。一些人报告了使用刚性替代品进行 ASB 重建以防止术后额叶下垂。我们使用我们的三层技术[阔筋膜、脱细胞真皮同种异体移植物和带蒂鼻中隔瓣(PNSF)]评估额叶下垂的程度,而无需对大的筛板缺损进行刚性结构重建。
回顾性分析。
2010 年 8 月至 2011 年 11 月,9 例患者因 ASB 肿瘤接受 EETA 切除术。EETA 后额叶位移的程度,定义为 ASB 位置,是基于术前和术后影像学上额叶相对于鼻根-蝶鞍线的最低位置来计算的。正值表示向上位移,负值表示额叶向下位移。
平均筛板缺损大小为 9.3cm²(范围,5.0-13.8cm²)。术后额叶位移的平均距离为 0.2mm(范围,-3.9 至 2.9mm),无明显脑下垂的病例。平均随访时间为 10.1 个月(范围,4-19 个月)。无术后 CSF 漏。
在经鼻内镜切除筛板后,ASB 缺损修复可能不需要刚性结构修复。我们的多层颅底重建技术似乎可以满意地防止延迟性额叶下垂。