Suppr超能文献

严重脓毒症患者中β-内酰胺类抗生素持续输注:一项多中心、双盲、随机对照试验。

Continuous infusion of beta-lactam antibiotics in severe sepsis: a multicenter double-blind, randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, and Burns, Trauma and Critical Care Research Centre, University of Queensland, Brisbane.

出版信息

Clin Infect Dis. 2013 Jan;56(2):236-44. doi: 10.1093/cid/cis856. Epub 2012 Oct 16.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Beta-lactam antibiotics are a commonly used treatment for severe sepsis, with intermittent bolus dosing standard therapy, despite a strong theoretical rationale for continuous administration. The aim of this trial was to determine the clinical and pharmacokinetic differences between continuous and intermittent dosing in patients with severe sepsis.

METHODS

This was a prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial of continuous infusion versus intermittent bolus dosing of piperacillin-tazobactam, meropenem, and ticarcillin-clavulanate conducted in 5 intensive care units across Australia and Hong Kong. The primary pharmacokinetic outcome on treatment analysis was plasma antibiotic concentration above the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) on days 3 and 4. The assessed clinical outcomes were clinical response 7-14 days after study drug cessation, ICU-free days at day 28 and hospital survival.

RESULTS

Sixty patients were enrolled with 30 patients each allocated to the intervention and control groups. Plasma antibiotic concentrations exceeded the MIC in 82% of patients (18 of 22) in the continuous arm versus 29% (6 of 21) in the intermittent arm (P = .001). Clinical cure was higher in the continuous group (70% vs 43%; P = .037), but ICU-free days (19.5 vs 17 days; P = .14) did not significantly differ between groups. Survival to hospital discharge was 90% in the continuous group versus 80% in the intermittent group (P = .47).

CONCLUSIONS

Continuous administration of beta-lactam antibiotics achieved higher plasma antibiotic concentrations than intermittent administration with improvement in clinical cure. This study provides a strong rationale for further multicenter trials with sufficient power to identify differences in patient-centered endpoints.

摘要

背景

β-内酰胺类抗生素是严重脓毒症的常用治疗方法,尽管连续输注给药具有很强的理论基础,但间歇性推注给药仍是标准疗法。本试验旨在确定严重脓毒症患者连续输注与间歇性推注给药的临床和药代动力学差异。

方法

这是一项在澳大利亚和中国香港的 5 个重症监护病房进行的前瞻性、双盲、随机对照试验,比较了哌拉西林他唑巴坦、美罗培南和替卡西林克拉维酸的连续输注与间歇性推注给药。治疗分析的主要药代动力学结局是第 3 天和第 4 天的血浆抗生素浓度超过最低抑菌浓度(MIC)。评估的临床结局是研究药物停药后 7-14 天的临床反应、第 28 天的 ICU 无天数和住院生存率。

结果

共纳入 60 例患者,每组 30 例患者分别分配到干预组和对照组。连续组有 82%(22 例中的 18 例)的患者血浆抗生素浓度超过 MIC,而间歇组仅有 29%(21 例中的 6 例)(P=0.001)。连续组的临床治愈率更高(70%比 43%;P=0.037),但两组 ICU 无天数(19.5 天比 17 天;P=0.14)无显著差异。连续组的住院生存率为 90%,间歇组为 80%(P=0.47)。

结论

β-内酰胺类抗生素连续给药比间歇性给药能达到更高的血浆抗生素浓度,从而改善临床治愈率。本研究为进一步进行具有足够效力以确定以患者为中心的结局差异的多中心试验提供了强有力的依据。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验