Suppr超能文献

经改良技术经冠状窦静脉和分支行心内膜导线取出术。

Percutaneous extraction of leads from coronary sinus vein and branch by modified techniques.

机构信息

Department of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing 100044, China.

出版信息

Chin Med J (Engl). 2012 Oct;125(20):3707-11.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) device and coronary sinus (CS) lead extraction are required due to the occurrence of systemic infection, malfunction, or upgrade. Relevant research of CS lead extraction is rare, especially in developing countries because of the high cost and lack of specialized tools. We aimed to evaluate percutaneous extraction of CS leads by modified conventional techniques.

METHODS

Of 200 patients referred for lead extraction from January 2007 to June 2011, 24 (12.0%) involved CS leads (24 CS leads). We prospectively analyzed clinical characteristics, optimized extraction techniques and feasibility of extraction.

RESULTS

Complete procedural success was achieved in 23 patients (95.8%), and the clinical success in 24 patients (100.0%). The leading indication for CS lead extraction was infection (66.7%). Mean implant duration was (29.5 ± 20.2) months (range, 3 - 78 months). Sixteen CS leads (66.6%) were removed with locking stylets plus manual traction by superior transvenous approach. Mechanical dilatation and counter-traction was required to free fibrotic adhesions and extract 4 CS leads (16.7%), which had longer implant duration than other leads ((62.5 ± 12.3) vs. (22.9 ± 14.1) months, P < 0.05). Another 4 CS (16.7%) leads were removed by modified and innovative snare techniques from femoral vein approach. Median extraction time was 11 minutes (range, 3 - 61 minutes) per CS lead, which had significant correlation with implant duration (r = 0.8, P < 0.001). Sixteen patients (66.6%) were reimplanted with new devices at a median of 7.5 days after extraction. Median followed-up was 23.5 months (range, 8 - 61 months), three patients died due to sudden cardiac death (26 months), heart failure (45 and 57 months, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The modified procedure was proved to be practical for percutaneous extraction of CS leads, especially in developing countries lacking expensive powered sheaths.

摘要

背景

由于发生全身感染、器械故障或升级,需要进行心脏再同步治疗(CRT)器械和冠状窦(CS)导联的更换。CS 导联的更换相关研究很少,尤其是在发展中国家,因为其成本高且缺乏专用工具。我们旨在评估改良传统技术经皮 CS 导联的拔除。

方法

2007 年 1 月至 2011 年 6 月期间,有 200 例患者因需要进行导联拔除而被转诊,其中 24 例(12.0%)涉及 CS 导联(24 条 CS 导联)。我们前瞻性分析了临床特征、优化的拔除技术和拔除的可行性。

结果

23 例患者(95.8%)实现了完全手术成功,24 例患者(100.0%)达到了临床成功。CS 导联拔除的主要适应证是感染(66.7%)。平均植入时间为(29.5±20.2)个月(范围,378 个月)。16 条 CS 导联(66.6%)通过经上腔静脉逆行的带锁导丝加手动牵引方式被成功拔除。4 条 CS 导联(16.7%)因纤维化粘连严重,需要使用机械扩张和反向牵引,这些导联的植入时间比其他导联长[(62.5±12.3)比(22.9±14.1)个月,P<0.05]。另外 4 条 CS 导联(16.7%)通过改良的创新性圈套技术从股静脉入路被成功拔除。每条 CS 导联的平均拔除时间为 11 分钟(范围,361 分钟),与植入时间显著相关(r=0.8,P<0.001)。16 例患者(66.6%)在拔除后平均 7.5 天(范围,361 天)内重新植入了新的器械。中位随访时间为 23.5 个月(范围,861 个月),3 例患者因心脏性猝死(26 个月)、心力衰竭(45 个月和 57 个月)而死亡。

结论

改良后的方法被证明对于经皮 CS 导联的拔除是实用的,特别是在缺乏昂贵的电动鞘管的发展中国家。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验