Zhuge Wu, Ben-Galim Peleg, Hipp John A, Reitman Charles A
Departments of *Orthopedic Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine †Medical Metrics, Houston, TX.
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2015 May;28(4):147-51. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e31827734bc.
Observational diagnostic study on consecutive patients.
To assess the efficacy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for detecting spinal soft tissue injury after acute trauma using intraoperative findings as a reference standard.
Recognizing injuries to spinal soft tissue structures is critical for proper decision making and management for blunt trauma victims. Although MRI is considered the gold standard for imaging of soft tissues, its ability to identify specific components of soft tissue damage in acute spine trauma patients is poorly documented and controversial.
Intraoperative findings were recorded for 21 acute spinal trauma patients (study group) and 14 nontraumatic spinal surgery patients (control group). Preoperative MRI's were evaluated randomly and blindly by 2 neuroradiologists. MRI and intraoperative findings were compared. By using the intraoperative findings as the reference standard, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of MRI in detecting spinal soft tissue injury were determined.
MRI was 100% sensitive and specific in detecting injury to the anterior longitudinal ligament. MRI was moderately sensitive (80%) but highly specific (100%) for injury to the posterior longitudinal ligament. In contrast, MRI was highly sensitive but less specific in detecting injury to paraspinal muscles (100%, 77%), intervertebral disk (100%, 71%), and interspinous ligament (100%, 64%). MRI was moderately sensitive and specific in detecting ligamentum flavum injury (80% and 86.7%) but poorly sensitive for facet capsule injury (62.5%).
MRI demonstrated high sensitivity for spinal soft tissue injuries. However, MRI showed a definite trend to overestimate interspinous ligament, intervertebral disk, and paraspinal muscle injuries. On the basis of these results, we would consider MRI to be a useful tool for spine clearance after trauma. Conversely, caution should be applied when using MRI for operative decision making due to its less predictable specificity.
对连续患者进行的观察性诊断研究。
以术中发现为参考标准,评估磁共振成像(MRI)检测急性创伤后脊柱软组织损伤的疗效。
识别脊柱软组织结构损伤对于钝性创伤患者的正确决策和管理至关重要。尽管MRI被认为是软组织成像的金标准,但其在急性脊柱创伤患者中识别软组织损伤特定成分的能力记录较少且存在争议。
记录21例急性脊柱创伤患者(研究组)和14例非创伤性脊柱手术患者(对照组)的术中发现。2名神经放射科医生随机且盲法评估术前MRI。比较MRI和术中发现。以术中发现为参考标准,确定MRI检测脊柱软组织损伤的敏感性、特异性、阳性和阴性预测值。
MRI在检测前纵韧带损伤方面敏感性和特异性均为100%。MRI检测后纵韧带损伤的敏感性中等(80%)但特异性高(100%)。相比之下,MRI检测椎旁肌损伤(100%,77%)、椎间盘损伤(100%,71%)和棘间韧带损伤(100%,64%)时敏感性高但特异性较低。MRI检测黄韧带损伤的敏感性和特异性中等(分别为80%和86.7%),但检测关节囊损伤的敏感性较差(62.5%)。
MRI对脊柱软组织损伤显示出高敏感性。然而,MRI显示出高估棘间韧带、椎间盘和椎旁肌损伤的明确趋势。基于这些结果,我们认为MRI是创伤后脊柱评估的有用工具。相反,由于其特异性较难预测,在使用MRI进行手术决策时应谨慎。