Suppr超能文献

美国痴呆症患者的临终关怀:机构现实。

End-of-life care for patients with dementia in the United States: institutional realities.

机构信息

New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY 10595, USA.

出版信息

Health Econ Policy Law. 2012 Oct;7(4):485-98. doi: 10.1017/S1744133112000266.

Abstract

Few are satisfied with end-of-life care in the United States. For families and friends of people with dementia, end-of-life care is particularly frustrating. Providing better end-of-life care to people with dementia is urgent because the prevalence of the disease is increasing rapidly. Dementia is currently the seventh leading cause of death in the United States and fifth leading cause of death among people aged 65 years and older. By 2050, there will be around 19 million people with Alzheimer's disease. This article reviews ethical and policy challenges associated with providing end-of-life care for people with dementia in the United States. I explain how disagreements about the meaning of futility lead to poor care for people with dementia. Most people agree that we should not provide care that is futile, but there is little agreement about how futility should be defined. US policies and politics clearly tip the balance in the direction of treatment, even in the face of strong evidence that such care does more harm than good. Although we may never reach a consensus, it is important to address these questions and think about how to develop policies that respect the different values.

摘要

在美国,很少有人对临终关怀感到满意。对于痴呆症患者的家属和朋友来说,临终关怀尤其令人沮丧。为痴呆症患者提供更好的临终关怀迫在眉睫,因为这种疾病的患病率正在迅速上升。痴呆症目前是美国第七大死因,也是 65 岁及以上人群的第五大死因。到 2050 年,将有大约 1900 万人患有阿尔茨海默病。本文回顾了与为美国痴呆症患者提供临终关怀相关的伦理和政策挑战。我解释了为什么对无效性的含义存在分歧会导致对痴呆症患者的护理不佳。大多数人都同意我们不应该提供无效的护理,但对于如何定义无效性几乎没有达成一致意见。美国的政策和政治明显倾向于治疗,即使有强有力的证据表明这种护理弊大于利。尽管我们可能永远无法达成共识,但重要的是要解决这些问题,并思考如何制定尊重不同价值观的政策。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验