Mackay C R, Marston W L, Dudler L
Basel Institute for Immunology, Switzerland.
J Exp Med. 1990 Mar 1;171(3):801-17. doi: 10.1084/jem.171.3.801.
In this report, we have addressed two questions concerning immunological memory: the way in which naive and memory T cells recirculate through the body, and the intrinsic rate of division within the naive and memory populations. We identified naive and memory T cells in sheep by their cell surface phenotype and their ability to respond to recall antigen. Memory T cells were CD2hi, CD58hi, CD44hi, CD11ahi, and CD45R-, as pertains in man. T cells that crossed from blood to the tissues of the hind leg and accumulated in the popliteal afferent lymph were all of memory phenotype. Conversely, T cells in efferent lymph, 90% of which entered the lymph node (LN) via high endothelial venules (HEV), were mostly of the naive phenotype (CD2lo, CD58lo, CD44lo, CD11alo, and CD45R+). The marked enrichment of these two phenotypes in different recirculatory compartments indicated that memory T cells selectively traffic from blood to peripheral tissues to LN (via afferent lymph), whereas naive T cells selectively traffic from blood to LN (via HEV). We argue that the differential use of these two recirculation pathways probably optimizes lymphocyte interactions with antigen. The nonrandom distribution of T cell subsets in various recirculatory compartments may be related to the relative proportion of memory cells in each subset. In particular, gamma/delta T cells in blood were almost exclusively of memory phenotype, and accumulated preferentially in afferent, but not in efferent, lymph. Finally, using the bromo-deoxyuridine labeling technique, we found that at least a sizeable proportion of memory T cells, whether in blood or afferent lymph, were a dividing population of cells, whereas naive T cells were a nondividing population. This result supports an alternative model of lymphocyte memory that assumes that maintenance of memory requires persistent antigenic stimulation.
在本报告中,我们探讨了有关免疫记忆的两个问题:初始T细胞和记忆T细胞在体内循环的方式,以及初始群体和记忆群体内的固有分裂速率。我们通过绵羊的细胞表面表型及其对回忆抗原的反应能力来识别初始T细胞和记忆T细胞。与人类情况一样,记忆T细胞为CD2hi、CD58hi、CD44hi、CD11ahi和CD45R-。从血液进入后腿组织并积聚在腘窝传入淋巴中的T细胞均为记忆表型。相反,传出淋巴中的T细胞,其中90%通过高内皮静脉(HEV)进入淋巴结(LN),大多为初始表型(CD2lo、CD58lo、CD44lo、CD11alo和CD45R+)。这两种表型在不同循环隔室中的显著富集表明,记忆T细胞选择性地从血液进入外周组织再到LN(通过传入淋巴),而初始T细胞则选择性地从血液进入LN(通过HEV)。我们认为,这两种循环途径的差异使用可能优化了淋巴细胞与抗原的相互作用。T细胞亚群在各种循环隔室中的非随机分布可能与每个亚群中记忆细胞的相对比例有关。特别是,血液中的γ/δT细胞几乎完全是记忆表型,并且优先积聚在传入淋巴而非传出淋巴中。最后,使用溴脱氧尿苷标记技术,我们发现,无论在血液还是传入淋巴中,至少相当一部分记忆T细胞是正在分裂的细胞群体,而初始T细胞是不分裂的细胞群体。这一结果支持了淋巴细胞记忆的另一种模型,该模型假设记忆的维持需要持续的抗原刺激。