Suppr超能文献

内镜经鼻蝶窦入路术后鼻部症状。

Postoperative nasal symptoms associated with an endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach.

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 505 Banpo-dong, Seocho-gu, 137-701 Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2013 Mar;270(4):1355-9. doi: 10.1007/s00405-012-2226-x. Epub 2012 Oct 19.

Abstract

Recent studies have indicated the usefulness of endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach (EETSA). A few studies have reported on the postoperative nasal symptoms of patients who have undergone EETSA. Therefore, we adopted a rhinologic perspective to compare preoperative and postoperative nasal symptoms after performing a binostril, four-hand EETSA. Patients who were scheduled to undergo binostril, four-hand EETSA underwent preoperative nasal evaluation using the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE), Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-20 (SNOT-20), and a visual analogue scale (VAS) to assess several nasal symptoms. Repeat testing was performed 6 months postoperatively. Paired Student's t tests were used to compare preoperative and postoperative scores. A total of 142 patients who underwent a binostril, four-hand EETSA were included in this study. We found no statistically significant differences between preoperative and postoperative NOSE, total SNOT-20 scores, or scores on the VAS for nasal obstruction, sneezing, rhinorrhea, snoring, or facial pain. However, VAS of olfactory change increased significantly after EETSA (p < 0.05). The binostril, four-hand EETSA would be a useful method because it permits operative manipulability and a wide visual field for skull base lesions. However, rhinologists must consider postoperative nasal symptoms and perform a proper preoperative examination, especially with regard to the olfactory function, and inform patients scheduled for EETSA of potential postoperative changes.

摘要

最近的研究表明,内镜经鼻蝶入路(EETSA)非常有用。有一些研究报告了接受 EETSA 的患者术后鼻部症状。因此,我们采用鼻科学的角度,比较了双侧鼻孔、四手操作 EETSA 前后的鼻部症状。计划接受双侧鼻孔、四手操作 EETSA 的患者在术前使用鼻腔阻塞症状评估(NOSE)、鼻-鼻窦炎结局测试 20 项(SNOT-20)和视觉模拟量表(VAS)对几种鼻部症状进行评估。术后 6 个月进行重复测试。采用配对学生 t 检验比较术前和术后评分。本研究共纳入 142 例接受双侧鼻孔、四手操作 EETSA 的患者。我们发现,NOSE、总 SNOT-20 评分或 VAS 评估的鼻塞、打喷嚏、流涕、打鼾或面部疼痛评分在术前和术后均无统计学差异。然而,EETSA 后 VAS 的嗅觉变化显著增加(p<0.05)。双侧鼻孔、四手操作 EETSA 是一种有用的方法,因为它允许手术操作和颅底病变的广阔视野。然而,鼻科医生必须考虑术后鼻部症状,并进行适当的术前检查,特别是嗅觉功能,并告知接受 EETSA 的患者潜在的术后变化。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验