Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt, 10587 Berlin, Germany.
Cytometry A. 2013 Feb;83(2):197-204. doi: 10.1002/cyto.a.22213. Epub 2012 Oct 18.
We compare flow cytometric and microscopic determination of cell viability by fluorescence labeling using calcein acetoxy-methyl-ester and ethidium homodimer-1 as live and dead stain, respectively. Peripheral blood monocytes served as model system and were accumulated applying density gradients. Subsequently, monocytes were further enriched by magnetic-activated or fluorescence-activated cell sorting (MACS, FACS) targeting the antigen CD14. Identical samples were used for flow cytometric and microscopic analysis to allow direct comparison of both analysis methods. More than 1,000 cells were measured for each sample to minimize the measurement uncertainty caused by counting statistics. We observed good agreement of flow cytometric and microscopic viability measurements. On average, the difference in viability measured by flow cytometry and microscopy amounted to (2.7 ± 1.4)% for live staining and (1.7 ± 1.2)% for dead staining. These deviations were similar to the uncertainty of measurement for cell viability, thus demonstrating that both methods delivered equal results. Besides monocytes, comparison of flow cytometric and microscopy viability for MACS enriched CD34-positive cells also showed consistent results.
我们比较了使用 calcein acetoxy-methyl-ester 和 ethidium homodimer-1 分别作为活细胞和死细胞染料的荧光标记流式细胞术和显微镜法测定细胞活力。外周血单核细胞作为模型系统,通过密度梯度法进行积累。随后,通过针对抗原 CD14 的磁激活或荧光激活细胞分选(MACS、FACS)进一步富集单核细胞。相同的样本用于流式细胞术和显微镜分析,以允许直接比较两种分析方法。为了最小化由于计数统计引起的测量不确定性,对每个样本测量了 1000 多个细胞。我们观察到流式细胞术和显微镜法测量的细胞活力具有良好的一致性。平均而言,流式细胞术和显微镜法测量的活细胞染色的活力差异为(2.7±1.4)%,死细胞染色的活力差异为(1.7±1.2)%。这些偏差与细胞活力测量的不确定性相似,从而表明两种方法均得出了相同的结果。除单核细胞外,MACS 富集的 CD34 阳性细胞的流式细胞术和显微镜法活力比较也显示出一致的结果。