Suppr超能文献

经支气管超声与淋巴增殖性疾病:一项回顾性研究。

Endobronchial ultrasound and lymphoproliferative disorders: a retrospective study.

机构信息

Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA.

出版信息

Ann Thorac Surg. 2012 Dec;94(6):1830-4. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.08.051. Epub 2012 Oct 22.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) has been shown to have excellent diagnostic performance for mediastinal staging of lung cancer. The utility of EBUS-TBNA for the diagnosis of lymphoproliferative disorders involving the mediastinum or hila, or both, is unclear.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was completed of all patients diagnosed with a lymphoproliferative disorder involving the mediastinum or hila, or both, who underwent an EBUS-TBNA within 3 months of the diagnosis.

RESULTS

Sixty-five patients with mediastinal or hilar lymph node, or both, involvement of their lymphoproliferative disorder underwent EBUS-TBNA within 3 months of their diagnosis. The initial EBUS-TBNA was nondiagnostic in 34 (52%), 11 were subsequently diagnosed by mediastinoscopy, and the remaining 23 were diagnosed by biopsy of a distant site, with involvement of the mediastinum or hilum assumed from preestablished radiographic criteria. A EBUS-TBNA specimen in 31 patients (48%) was interpreted as consistent with or suspicious for a lymphoproliferative disorder. The overall sensitivity of EBUS-TBNA for establishing a definitive diagnosis was 25 of 65 (38%). The sensitivity was lower for new patients, at 7 of 32 (22%), and better for patients with recurrence, at 18 of 33 (55%).

CONCLUSIONS

Contrary to previous studies, our findings suggest that EBUS-TBNA does not provide sufficient diagnostic material for accurate lymphoproliferative disorder subtyping in a significant number of patients and performs especially poorly when evaluating new patients. Mediastinoscopy should still be considered as the initial diagnostic procedure of choice when the clinical suspicion for a lymphoproliferative disorder is high, unless the patient is being evaluated for a recurrence of prior disorder.

摘要

背景

经支气管超声引导针吸活检术(EBUS-TBNA)已被证明在肺癌纵隔分期方面具有出色的诊断性能。然而,EBUS-TBNA 用于诊断涉及纵隔或肺门或两者的淋巴增生性疾病的效用尚不清楚。

方法

对所有在诊断后 3 个月内接受 EBUS-TBNA 检查的诊断为涉及纵隔或肺门或两者的淋巴增生性疾病的患者进行了回顾性分析。

结果

65 例纵隔或肺门淋巴结受累或两者均受累的淋巴增生性疾病患者在诊断后 3 个月内行 EBUS-TBNA 检查。初次 EBUS-TBNA 检查结果为非诊断性的有 34 例(52%),11 例随后通过纵隔镜检查诊断,其余 23 例通过远处部位活检诊断,根据预先确定的影像学标准假设纵隔或肺门受累。31 例(48%)患者的 EBUS-TBNA 标本被解释为符合或疑似淋巴增生性疾病。EBUS-TBNA 确定明确诊断的总体敏感性为 65 例中的 25 例(38%)。新患者的敏感性为 7/32(22%),复发患者的敏感性为 18/33(55%)。

结论

与先前的研究结果相反,我们的研究结果表明,EBUS-TBNA 并不能为大量患者提供足够的诊断材料来准确进行淋巴增生性疾病的亚型分类,尤其是在评估新患者时表现不佳。如果临床怀疑为淋巴增生性疾病,纵隔镜检查仍应被视为首选的初始诊断程序,除非患者正在接受先前疾病复发的评估。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验