Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, 401 Quarry Road, Stanford, CA, 94305-5718, USA,
J Behav Med. 2014 Feb;37(1):22-36. doi: 10.1007/s10865-012-9461-x. Epub 2012 Oct 20.
Clinicians working with cancer patients listen to them, observe their behavior, and monitor their physiology. How do we proceed when these indicators do not align? Under self-relevant stress, non-cancer repressors respond with high arousal but report low anxiety; the high-anxious report high anxiety but often have lower arousal. This study extends discrepancy research on repressors and the high-anxious to a metastatic breast cancer sample and examines physician rating of coping. Before and during a Trier Social Stress Test (TSST), we assessed affect, autonomic reactivity, and observers coded emotional expression from TSST videotapes. We compared non-extreme (N = 40), low-anxious (N = 16), high-anxious (N = 19), and repressors (N = 19). Despite reported low anxiety, repressors expressed significantly greater Tension or anxiety cues. Despite reported high anxiety, the high-anxious expressed significantly greater Hostile Affect rather than Tension. Physicians rated both groups as coping significantly better than others. Future research might productively study physician-patient interaction in these groups.
临床医生在治疗癌症患者时,会倾听他们的意见、观察他们的行为并监测他们的生理状况。当这些指标不相符时,我们该如何处理?在与自身相关的压力下,非癌症抑制者会表现出高度唤醒但报告低焦虑;高焦虑者报告高焦虑,但往往唤醒程度较低。本研究将抑制者和高焦虑者的差异研究扩展到转移性乳腺癌样本,并考察了医生对应对方式的评估。在特里尔社会压力测试(TSST)之前和期间,我们评估了情绪、自主反应,观察者从 TSST 录像带中对情绪表达进行了编码。我们比较了非极端(N=40)、低焦虑(N=16)、高焦虑(N=19)和抑制者(N=19)。尽管报告的焦虑程度较低,但抑制者表现出明显更多的紧张或焦虑线索。尽管报告的焦虑程度较高,但高焦虑者表现出明显更多的敌对情绪,而不是紧张。医生认为这两个群体的应对方式都明显好于其他群体。未来的研究可能会在这些群体中研究医患互动。