Fuller B F, Conner D A
University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver 80262.
Psychol Rep. 1990 Feb;66(1):103-10. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1990.66.1.103.
70 female graduate students from a western university were classified as to personality type: Highly Anxious, Truly Low Anxious, and Repressing, using a combination of scores from the Taylor Manifest Anxiety Scale and the Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scales. Each subject's preference for monitor or blunter coping strategy was assessed via the Miller Behavioral Style Scale. Highly Anxious subjects chose significantly more monitor strategies than did Truly Low Anxious subjects or Repressors. The number of blunter strategies chosen did not differ across personality types. Chi-squared indicated that Highly Anxious subjects were more often classified as monitors than blunters whereas the proportions of monitors and blunters did not significantly differ between Truly Low Anxious subjects and Repressors. Results suggest that the repressor trait is distinct from avoidant and vigilant coping strategies.
来自一所西部大学的70名女研究生根据性格类型进行了分类：高度焦虑型、真正低焦虑型和压抑型，分类依据是泰勒显性焦虑量表和马洛-克劳恩社会赞许性量表的得分组合。通过米勒行为风格量表评估了每个受试者对监控或直率应对策略的偏好。高度焦虑的受试者选择监控策略的次数明显多于真正低焦虑的受试者或压抑型受试者。不同性格类型的受试者选择直率策略的次数没有差异。卡方检验表明，高度焦虑的受试者被归为监控型的比例高于直率型，而真正低焦虑的受试者和压抑型受试者中监控型和直率型的比例没有显著差异。结果表明，压抑特质与回避和警惕应对策略不同。
