Liu Xiaomo, Lin Jiuxiang, Ding Peng
Department of Orthodontics, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Scanning. 2013 Jul-Aug;35(4):265-72. doi: 10.1002/sca.21060. Epub 2012 Oct 19.
In this study, we tested the surface roughness of bracket slots and the friction coefficient between the bracket and the stainless steel archwire before and after orthodontic treatment. There were four experimental groups: groups 1 and 2 were 3M new and retrieved brackets, respectively, and groups 3 and 4 were BioQuick new and retrieved brackets, respectively. All retrieved brackets were taken from patients with the first premolar extraction and using sliding mechanics to close the extraction space. The surface roughness of specimens was evaluated using an optical interferometry profilometer, which is faster and nondestructive compared with a stylus profilometer, and provided a larger field, needing no sample preparation, compared with atomic force microscopy. Orthodontic treatment resulted in significant increases in surface roughness and coefficient of friction for both brands of brackets. However, there was no significant difference by brand for new or retrieved brackets. These retrieval analysis results highlight the necessity of reevaluating the properties and clinical behavior of brackets during treatment to make appropriate treatment decisions.
在本研究中,我们测试了正畸治疗前后托槽槽沟的表面粗糙度以及托槽与不锈钢弓丝之间的摩擦系数。共有四个实验组:第1组和第2组分别为3M的新托槽和回收托槽,第3组和第4组分别为BioQuick的新托槽和回收托槽。所有回收托槽均取自拔除第一前磨牙并采用滑动机制关闭拔牙间隙的患者。使用光学干涉轮廓仪评估样本的表面粗糙度,与触针轮廓仪相比,它速度更快且无损,并且与原子力显微镜相比,它提供的视野更大,无需样本制备。正畸治疗导致两种品牌托槽的表面粗糙度和摩擦系数均显著增加。然而,新托槽或回收托槽在品牌方面没有显著差异。这些回收分析结果凸显了在治疗期间重新评估托槽性能和临床行为以做出适当治疗决策的必要性。