Department of Internal Medicine, Soon Chun Hyang University Bucheon Hospital, Soon Chun Hyang University College of Medicine, Bucheon, Korea.
Clin Mol Hepatol. 2012 Sep;18(3):272-8. doi: 10.3350/cmh.2012.18.3.272. Epub 2012 Sep 25.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: When combined with pegylated interferon alpha-2b (Peg-IFN α-2b) for the treatment of genotype 1 chronic hepatitis C (CHC) in Korea, the current guideline for the initial ribavirin (RBV) dose is based on body weight. However, since the mean body weight is lower for Korean patients than for patients in Western countries, current guidelines might result in Korean patients being overdosed with RBV.
We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with genotype 1 CHC who were treated with Peg-IFN α-2b and RBV combination therapy. We divided the patients into groups A (≥15 mg/kg/day, n=23) and B (<15 mg/kg/day, n=26), given that the standard dose is 15 mg/kg/day. The clinical course in terms of the virologic response, adverse events, and dose modification rate was compared between the two groups after therapy completion.
The early response rates (92.0% vs. 83.3%, P=0.634) and sustained virologic response rates (82.6% vs. 73.1%, P=0.506) did not differ significantly between the two groups. During the treatment period, the RBV dose reduction rate was significantly higher in group A than in group B (60.9% vs. 23.1%, P=0.01).
RBV dose reduction is performed frequently when patients are treated according to the current Korean guidelines. Given that lowering the RBV dose did not appear to decrease the virologic response during therapy, reducing RBV doses below the current Korean guideline may be effective for treatment, especially in low-weight patients.
背景/目的:在韩国,聚乙二醇干扰素 α-2b(Peg-IFN α-2b)联合利巴韦林(RBV)治疗基因 1 型慢性丙型肝炎(CHC)时,目前初始 RBV 剂量的指南基于体重。然而,由于韩国患者的平均体重低于西方国家患者,因此当前指南可能导致韩国患者 RBV 剂量过高。
我们回顾性分析了接受 Peg-IFN α-2b 和 RBV 联合治疗的基因 1 型 CHC 患者的病历。我们将患者分为 A 组(≥15mg/kg/天,n=23)和 B 组(<15mg/kg/天,n=26),因为标准剂量为 15mg/kg/天。比较两组患者在治疗结束后的病毒学应答、不良反应和剂量调整率。
两组患者的早期应答率(92.0% vs. 83.3%,P=0.634)和持续病毒学应答率(82.6% vs. 73.1%,P=0.506)无显著差异。在治疗期间,A 组的 RBV 剂量减少率明显高于 B 组(60.9% vs. 23.1%,P=0.01)。
根据当前韩国指南进行治疗时,常需要减少 RBV 剂量。由于在治疗过程中降低 RBV 剂量似乎不会降低病毒学应答,因此将 RBV 剂量降低至低于当前韩国指南可能对治疗有效,尤其是对低体重患者。