Suppr超能文献

青年人群复杂主髂动脉闭塞性疾病的重建手术治疗。

Reconstructive surgery for complex aortoiliac occlusive disease in young adults.

机构信息

Vascular Surgery Section, Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences, University of Padua School of Medicine, Padova, Italy.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 2012 Dec;56(6):1606-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.05.105. Epub 2012 Oct 23.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although aortoiliofemoral bypass grafting is the optimal revascularization method for patients with severe aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD), previous studies have documented poor patency rates in young adults. This study investigated whether young patients with AIOD have worse outcomes in patency, limb salvage, and long-term survival rates after reconstructive surgery than their older counterparts.

METHODS

Patients aged≤50 years undergoing reconstructive surgery at our institution for AIOD between 1995 and 2010 were compared with a cohort of randomly selected patients aged≥60 years (two for each of the young patients, matched for year of operation), analyzing demographics, risk factors, indications for surgery, operative details, and outcomes.

RESULTS

Among 927 consecutive patients undergoing primary surgery for AIOD, 78 (8.4%) aged≤50 years (mean age, 48.4 years) and 156 older control patients (mean age, 71.2 years) were identified. The younger patients were mainly men (81%) and 59% had surgery for limb salvage and 41% for disabling claudication (P=.02). Compared with older patients, they were significantly more likely to be smokers (90% vs 72%; P=.002) and had previously needed significantly more inflow procedures (28% vs 16%; P=.03). Only one death occurred perioperatively (30-day) among the control patients, and no major amputations or graft infections occurred in either group. The need for subsequent infrainguinal reconstructions was greater in the younger patients (18% vs 7%; P=.01). The primary patency rates were inferior in the younger patients at 5 years (82% and 75%) and 10 years (95% and 90%; P=.01), whereas assisted secondary patency (89% and 82% vs 96% and 91%; P=.08), secondary patency (93% and 86% vs 98% and 92%; P=.19), limb salvage (88% and 83% vs 95% and 91%; P=.13), and survival rates (87% and 76% vs 91% and 84%; P=.32) were comparable in the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that despite a higher primary graft failure rate than that in older patients, aortoiliofemoral revascularization for complex AIOD is a safe procedure for younger patients with disabling claudication or limb-threatening ischemia, providing they are willing to follow a regular protocol to complete their postoperative surveillance and to undergo graft revision as necessary.

摘要

背景

虽然腹主动脉-髂-股动脉旁路移植术是治疗严重主动脉髂动脉闭塞性疾病(AIOD)患者的最佳血运重建方法,但先前的研究记录了年轻患者的通畅率较差。本研究旨在探讨年轻的 AIOD 患者在血管重建手术后的通畅率、肢体挽救率和长期生存率方面是否比年长患者差。

方法

本研究比较了 1995 年至 2010 年间在我院接受 AIOD 重建手术的≤50 岁患者与随机选择的≥60 岁患者队列(每例年轻患者匹配 2 例,按手术年份匹配),分析患者的人口统计学、危险因素、手术适应证、手术细节和结果。

结果

在 927 例连续接受 AIOD 原发手术的患者中,78 例(8.4%)年龄≤50 岁(平均年龄 48.4 岁),156 例年龄较大的对照组患者(平均年龄 71.2 岁)。年轻患者主要为男性(81%),59%为肢体挽救手术,41%为有症状性跛行(P=.02)。与年长患者相比,年轻患者更有可能吸烟(90%比 72%;P=.002),并且需要更多的流入道手术(28%比 16%;P=.03)。对照组中只有 1 例患者在围手术期(30 天)死亡,两组均无重大截肢或移植物感染。年轻患者需要进行更多的后续下肢血管重建(18%比 7%;P=.01)。年轻患者的主要通畅率在 5 年(82%和 75%)和 10 年(95%和 90%;P=.01)时较低,而辅助性二期通畅率(89%和 82%比 96%和 91%;P=.08)、二期通畅率(93%和 86%比 98%和 92%;P=.19)、肢体挽救率(88%和 83%比 95%和 91%;P=.13)和生存率(87%和 76%比 91%和 84%;P=.32)在两组之间无差异。

结论

本研究表明,尽管年轻患者的原发性移植物失败率高于年长患者,但对于有症状性跛行或肢体缺血威胁的年轻患者,腹主动脉-髂-股动脉血运重建是一种安全的手术方法,前提是他们愿意遵循常规方案完成术后监测,并在必要时进行移植物修正。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验