Suppr超能文献

日本商业猪群中母猪产仔率低的群体管理程序和相关因素。

Herd management procedures and factors associated with low farrowing rate of female pigs in Japanese commercial herds.

机构信息

School of Agriculture, Meiji University, Higashi-mita 1-1-1, Tama-ku, Kawasaki, Kanagawa 214-8571, Japan.

出版信息

Prev Vet Med. 2013 Apr 1;109(1-2):69-75. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2012.09.014. Epub 2012 Oct 23.

Abstract

The objective of the present study was to compare management procedures and production factors between low-farrowing-rate herds (LFR herds) and the remaining herds (Non-LFR herds). The questionnaires were sent to the producers of 115 herds that use the same recording system. The questionnaire requested information about management procedures in 2008: (i) daily frequencies of estrus detection: once or twice a day; and (ii) the timing of first insemination. Data from 93 completed questionnaires (80.9%) were coordinated with the reproductive data of individual female pigs from the recording system. The data included 78,321 service records from 37,777 sows and gilts. Herds were classified into two groups on the basis of the lower 25th percentile of farrowing rate: LFR herds (76.5% or lower) and Non-LFR herds (76.6% or higher). At the herd level, a two-sample t-test, was used to compare the surveyed management procedures between the two herd groups. At the individual level, two-level mixed-effects models were applied, by using a herd at the level two and an individual record at the level one to determine associations between low farrowing rate and management procedures or production factors in gilts and sows. Gilt and sow models were separately constructed. Means (±SEM) of farrowing rate in LFR herds and Non-LFR herds were 71.3±0.92 and 85.5±0.54%, respectively. The lower farrowing rates of gilts and sows in LFR herds were associated with once-daily estrus detection, late timing of first insemination and single mating (P<0.05). In LFR herds that detected estrus only once a day, the farrowing rate decreased by 10.5% in first-serviced gilts and by 4.2% in reserviced sows compared with twice daily estrus detection (P<0.05). However, there was no such association in Non-LFR herds (P>0.05). The LFR herds had higher percentages of single-mated gilts and sows than Non-LFR herds (P<0.05). Fewer LFR herds than Non-LFR herds performed first insemination immediately after first estrus detection for gilts or by 6-12h for sows (P<0.05). In order to improve the farrowing rate in LFR herds, we recommend detecting estrus twice a day and performing first insemination earlier after first estrus detection; immediately for gilts and by 6-12h for sows. Additionally, increasing the percentage of multiple inseminations can effectively improve the farrowing rate.

摘要

本研究旨在比较低产仔率(LFR)猪群和其余猪群(非 LFR 猪群)的管理程序和生产因素。研究人员向使用相同记录系统的 115 个猪群的养殖户发放了问卷。问卷要求养殖户提供 2008 年的管理程序信息:(i)发情检测的日常频率:每天一次或两次;(ii)首次配种的时间。93 份完成的问卷(80.9%)的数据与记录系统中个体母猪的繁殖数据进行了协调。数据包括 37777 头母猪和后备母猪的 78321 个配种记录。根据产仔率的第 25 百分位数将猪群分为两组:LFR 猪群(76.5%或更低)和非 LFR 猪群(76.6%或更高)。在猪群水平上,采用两样本 t 检验比较两组猪群的调查管理程序。在个体水平上,采用两级混合效应模型,使用猪群作为二级水平,个体记录作为一级水平,以确定低产仔率与后备母猪和经产母猪管理程序或生产因素之间的关系。分别构建后备母猪和经产母猪模型。LFR 猪群和非 LFR 猪群的产仔率分别为 71.3±0.92%和 85.5±0.54%。LFR 猪群后备母猪和经产母猪的较低产仔率与发情检测次数少、首次配种时间晚和单次配种有关(P<0.05)。在每天只发情检测一次的 LFR 猪群中,首次配种的后备母猪产仔率比每天发情检测两次的后备母猪低 10.5%,经产母猪低 4.2%(P<0.05)。然而,在非 LFR 猪群中没有这种关联(P>0.05)。LFR 猪群中单配后备母猪和经产母猪的比例高于非 LFR 猪群(P<0.05)。与非 LFR 猪群相比,LFR 猪群首次配种时进行发情检测的后备母猪和经产母猪较少(P<0.05)。与非 LFR 猪群相比,LFR 猪群的后备母猪首次发情后立即进行首次配种的比例较低,而经产母猪的首次发情后首次配种的比例较低(P<0.05)。为了提高 LFR 猪群的产仔率,我们建议每天发情检测两次,并在首次发情后尽早进行首次配种;后备母猪立即配种,经产母猪在 6-12 小时内配种。此外,增加多次配种的比例可以有效提高产仔率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验