School of Agriculture, Meiji University, Kanagawa, Japan.
Theriogenology. 2010 Mar 15;73(5):587-94. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2009.10.014. Epub 2009 Dec 16.
The objectives of this study were to measure culling intervals and culling risks in the four stages of the reproductive life of female pigs and to compare culling intervals between the number of services and between herd groups, based on herd productivity. We also compared survival patterns of females pigs between these herd groups. Our data set included lifetime records of 52,792 females born between 2001 and 2004 in 101 commercial herds. Two herd groups were selected on the basis of the upper 25th percentile of pigs weaned per mated female per 5 yr between 2002 and 2006, namely the high-performing herds, and ordinary herds. Culled females were also allocated into four groups based on the stages of their reproductive life when culled: unmated gilts, mated gilts, unmated sows, and mated sows. Culling intervals in unmated gilts and mated gilts were defined as the number of days from birth to culling and from first mating to culling, respectively. Culling intervals in unmated sows and mated sows were the number of days from weaning to culling. The number of services was categorized into two groups: first service and reservice groups. Multilevel linear mixed-effects models and survival analysis were performed. Culling intervals (+/-SEM) in unmated gilts, mated gilts, unmated sows, and mated sows were 302.9+/-1.16, 98.4+/-0.92, 14.3+/-0.12, and 89.6+/-0.42 d, respectively. Culling risks in the four groups were 5.6%, 7.1%, 58.0%, and 29.3%, respectively. In unmated gilts, mated gilts, and mated sows, the culling intervals in the high-performing herds were 43.0, 18.9, and 16.0 d shorter than those in ordinary herds, respectively (P<0.05), but no difference was found between the herd groups for the culling interval of unmated sows. For mated sows in the reservice group, culling intervals of high-performing herds were >or=13.7 d shorter than those of the ordinary herds (P<0.05), but for mated sows in the first service group, there was no difference in the culling interval between the herd groups. The culling hazard from 8 wk postweaning for mated sows in high-performing herds increased more rapidly than that in ordinary herds. In conclusion, to reduce culling intervals and improve herd productivity, we recommend implementing a strict culling policy for mated gilts and mated sows, especially reserviced females.
本研究的目的是测量母猪繁殖生命四个阶段的淘汰间隔和淘汰风险,并根据群体生产性能比较配种母猪的淘汰间隔与配种次数和群体之间的淘汰间隔。我们还比较了这些群体之间母猪的生存模式。我们的数据集中包括了 101 个商业群体中 2001 年至 2004 年间出生的 52792 头母猪的终生记录。根据 2002 年至 2006 年间每头配种母猪每年断奶仔猪数的前 25%,选择了两个群体,即高产母猪群和普通母猪群。淘汰母猪还根据淘汰时繁殖阶段分为四组:未配种后备母猪、配种后备母猪、未配种经产母猪和配种经产母猪。未配种后备母猪和配种后备母猪的淘汰间隔定义为从出生到淘汰和从首次配种到淘汰的天数。未配种经产母猪和配种经产母猪的淘汰间隔为从断奶到淘汰的天数。配种次数分为两组:初配组和重复配种组。采用多水平线性混合效应模型和生存分析。未配种后备母猪、配种后备母猪、未配种经产母猪和配种经产母猪的淘汰间隔(+/-SEM)分别为 302.9+/-1.16、98.4+/-0.92、14.3+/-0.12 和 89.6+/-0.42 d。这四个群体的淘汰风险分别为 5.6%、7.1%、58.0%和 29.3%。在未配种后备母猪、配种后备母猪和配种经产母猪中,高产母猪群的淘汰间隔分别比普通母猪群短 43.0、18.9 和 16.0 d(P<0.05),但未配种经产母猪的淘汰间隔在两个群体之间没有差异。对于重复配种组的配种经产母猪,高产母猪群的淘汰间隔比普通母猪群短>或=13.7 d(P<0.05),但对于初配组的配种经产母猪,两个群体的淘汰间隔没有差异。高产母猪群中配种经产母猪在断奶后 8 周的淘汰危险增加速度快于普通母猪群。总之,为了缩短淘汰间隔和提高群体生产性能,我们建议对配种后备母猪和配种经产母猪,特别是重复配种的母猪实施严格的淘汰政策。