Department of Surgery, San Antonio Military Medical Center, 3851 Roger Brooke Drive, Fort Sam Houston, TX 78234, USA.
Surg Endosc. 2013 Apr;27(4):1360-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2616-6. Epub 2012 Oct 24.
This report describes the authors' institutional experience using knotless unidirectional barbed absorbable suture to close the common enterotomy of the jejunojejunostomy (JJ) and to create a hand-sewn gastrojejunostomy (GJ) during laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.
A retrospective review of morbidly obese patients who underwent laparoscopic gastric bypass with a hand-sewn GJ between April 2011 and 2012 was performed. The authors' traditional technique (TT) consisted of using standard monofilament absorbable suture to close the common JJ enterotomy in a single running layer and to create the GJ with a two-layer anastomosis. A novel technique (NT) was introduced using knotless unidirectional barbed monofilament absorbable suture to perform both tasks. A comparison between these two techniques was performed.
In this study, 84 patients with a mean body mass index of 41.7 ± 4.7 kg/m(2) underwent laparoscopic gastric bypass using a hand-sewn technique. For the 84 patients, 75 primary procedures (89.3 %) and 9 revisional procedures (10.7 %) were performed. In 38 procedures (45.2 %), the TT was used, whereas 46 cases (54.8 %) were managed using the NT. For the primary procedures, the average operating room times were slightly faster in the NT group (178.9 ± 44.4 vs 154.2 ± 74.7 min; p = 0.08). The average hospital length of stay was comparable between the two groups (2.3 ± 0.7 vs 2.6 ± 1.4 days; p = 0.25). A 30-day follow-up assessment was obtained for all 84 patients, without a significant difference in the overall complication rate between the two groups (TT 18.4 % vs NT 13 %; p = 0.77). No complications were secondary to the JJ closure or gastrojejunostomy. The complications included bleeding (n = 1), small bowel obstruction (n = 1), dehydration (n = 2), esophagitis (n = 1), and subarachnoid hemorrhage (n = 1). No anastomotic leak or stenosis occurred in either group. The mean percentage of excess weight loss at 1 month was 21.3 % ± 5.4 %, without a significant difference between the two groups.
In the study cohort, the use of knotless unidirectional barbed suture instead of traditional monofilament absorbable suture had similar 30-day outcomes and appears to be a feasible option for laparoscopic bowel closure and anastomosis creation.
本报告描述了作者所在机构在腹腔镜 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路手术中使用无结单向带刺可吸收缝线关闭空肠空肠吻合术(JJ)共同肠切开术并手工缝合胃空肠吻合术(GJ)的经验。
对 2011 年 4 月至 2012 年期间接受腹腔镜胃旁路术且行手工 GJ 的病态肥胖患者进行回顾性分析。作者的传统技术(TT)包括使用标准的单丝可吸收缝线在单个连续层中关闭共同 JJ 肠切开术,并使用两层吻合术创建 GJ。引入了一种新的技术(NT),使用无结单向带刺单丝可吸收缝线来完成这两项任务。对这两种技术进行了比较。
本研究中,84 例平均 BMI 为 41.7±4.7kg/m²的患者接受了腹腔镜胃旁路手术,采用手工技术。84 例患者中,75 例为初次手术(89.3%),9 例为翻修手术(10.7%)。在 38 例(45.2%)手术中使用 TT,46 例(54.8%)使用 NT。对于初次手术,NT 组的手术时间略短(178.9±44.4 比 154.2±74.7 分钟;p=0.08)。两组的平均住院时间相似(2.3±0.7 比 2.6±1.4 天;p=0.25)。对 84 例患者进行了 30 天随访评估,两组的总体并发症发生率无显著差异(TT 18.4%比 NT 13%;p=0.77)。没有与 JJ 闭合或胃空肠吻合相关的并发症。并发症包括出血(n=1)、小肠梗阻(n=1)、脱水(n=2)、食管炎(n=1)和蛛网膜下腔出血(n=1)。两组均未发生吻合口漏或狭窄。1 个月时的平均超重减轻百分比为 21.3%±5.4%,两组之间无显著差异。
在研究队列中,使用无结单向带刺缝线代替传统的单丝可吸收缝线具有相似的 30 天结果,并且似乎是腹腔镜肠闭合和吻合术的一种可行选择。