Dingemann Carmen, Zoeller Christoph, Bataineh Ziad, Osthaus Alexander, Suempelmann Robert, Ure Benno
Department of Pediatric Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Strasse 1, Hannover, Germany.
Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2013 Feb;23(1):48-52. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1324693. Epub 2012 Oct 23.
Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) has gained wide acceptance for the pediatric population. Single-lung ventilation (SLV) has been suggested for thoracoscopic lung resection to provide better surgical exposure, but its role and sequelae compared with double-lung ventilation (DLV) have not been determined. The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility and effects of SLV and DLV in infants and children undergoing thoracoscopic lung resection.
Written informed consent from all guardians for anonymized data analysis and approval by the Institutional Review Board were obtained. A retrospective study on a consecutive series of infants and children who underwent thoracoscopic lung resection during an 11 years period was performed. SLV was selected mainly in lesions localized in the upper, middle, and/or central lung for reasons of surgical exposure. Patients with lower lobe lesions and those who underwent atypical resections were preferably operated under DLV. End points were conversion rate, duration of postoperative ventilation, and perioperative complications, such as, atelectasis or pneumonia.
Of 114 pediatric patients (58 female and 56 male; ratio 1.04:1) with a mean age of 7.1 years (3 days to 18.1 years), 62 patients underwent DLV and 52 patients underwent SLV for thoracoscopic lung resection. There were no significant differences between the two groups for conversion rate (DLV 8.1 vs. SLV 6.1%; p = 0.53), prompt extubation (DLV 50 vs. SLV 34.6%; p = 0.14), and postoperative atelectasis (DLV 35.5 vs. SLV 25%; p = 0.32). No major cardiorespiratory events, such as bleeding or pneumonia, were observed. No perioperative mortality occurred.
This is the first study on safety, effectiveness, and outcome of SLV and DLV in pediatric patients undergoing thoracoscopic lung resection. Our data suggest that both SLV and DLV can be safely performed with similar low rate of surgical complications, when specific selection criteria are applied.
电视辅助胸腔镜手术(VATS)已在儿科人群中获得广泛认可。有人建议在胸腔镜肺切除术中采用单肺通气(SLV)以提供更好的手术视野,但与双肺通气(DLV)相比,其作用和后遗症尚未确定。本研究的目的是探讨SLV和DLV在接受胸腔镜肺切除术的婴幼儿和儿童中的可行性及效果。
获得了所有监护人关于匿名数据分析的书面知情同意书,并得到了机构审查委员会的批准。对11年间连续接受胸腔镜肺切除术的婴幼儿和儿童进行了一项回顾性研究。由于手术视野的原因,SLV主要用于位于上、中、和/或中央肺的病变。下叶病变患者和接受非典型切除术的患者最好在DLV下进行手术。观察终点为转换率、术后通气时间和围手术期并发症,如肺不张或肺炎。
114例儿科患者(58例女性和56例男性;比例为1.04:1),平均年龄7.1岁(3天至18.1岁),其中62例患者在胸腔镜肺切除术中采用DLV,52例患者采用SLV。两组在转换率(DLV 8.1%对SLV 6.1%;p = 0.53)、快速拔管(DLV 50%对SLV 34.6%;p = 0.14)和术后肺不张(DLV 35.5%对SLV 25%;p = 0.32)方面无显著差异。未观察到重大心肺事件,如出血或肺炎。围手术期无死亡病例。
这是第一项关于SLV和DLV在接受胸腔镜肺切除术的儿科患者中的安全性、有效性和结果的研究。我们的数据表明,当应用特定的选择标准时,SLV和DLV均可安全进行,手术并发症发生率相似。