Suppr超能文献

评估区域贫困对死亡率的影响,避免构成偏差:一项自然实验。

Assessing the effect of regional deprivation on mortality avoiding compositional bias: a natural experiment.

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology & International Public Health, Bielefeld School of Public Health (BiSPH), Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.

出版信息

J Epidemiol Community Health. 2013 Mar;67(3):213-8. doi: 10.1136/jech-2012-201336. Epub 2012 Oct 23.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

We assessed the effect of regional deprivation on individual mortality by making use of a natural experiment: we followed up ethnic German resettlers from Former Soviet Union countries who were quasi-randomly distributed across the socioeconomically heterogeneous counties of Germany's federal state North Rhine-Westphalia (NRW).

METHODS

We used data from the retrospective cohort study 'AMOR' on the mortality of resettlers in NRW (n=34 393). Based on the postcode of the last known residence we linked study participants to the 54 counties of NRW, which were aggregated in six deprivation clusters. Mortality rates and standardised mortality ratios (SMRs) were calculated for each cluster. After a mean follow-up of 10 years, 2580 resettlers were deceased.

RESULTS

For male and female cohort members, mortality rates and SMRs were highest in the cluster 'poverty poles' (SMR men: 1.21, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.41; SMR women: 1.17, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.37), whereas they were lowest in the cluster 'prospering regions and suburban counties' (SMR women: 0.86, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.05) as well as in the cluster 'heterogeneous counties' (SMR men: 0.73, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.88).

CONCLUSIONS

The population which was quasi-randomly distributed to counties of differing socioeconomic status experienced different levels of mortality. It was highest in regions with the highest level of regional deprivation. Previous studies describing this positive relationship between mortality and regional deprivation could not differentiate between compositional and contextual effects. Thus, our findings indicate that in terms of mortality, regional deprivation does matter.

摘要

背景与目的

我们利用自然实验评估了地区贫困对个体死亡率的影响:我们随访了来自前苏联国家的德国族裔重新定居者,他们在德国北莱茵-威斯特法伦州(NRW)的社会经济异质性县中几乎是随机分布的。

方法

我们使用了 NRW 重新定居者死亡率回顾性队列研究“AMOR”的数据(n=34393)。根据最后已知住所的邮政编码,我们将研究参与者与 NRW 的 54 个县联系起来,这些县被分为六个贫困集群。为每个集群计算了死亡率和标准化死亡率比(SMR)。在平均 10 年的随访后,有 2580 名重新定居者死亡。

结果

对于男性和女性队列成员,死亡率和 SMR 最高的是“贫困极点”集群(男性 SMR:1.21,95%CI 1.04 至 1.41;女性 SMR:1.17,95%CI 0.99 至 1.37),而最低的是“繁荣地区和郊区县”集群(女性 SMR:0.86,95%CI 0.70 至 1.05)以及“异质县”集群(男性 SMR:0.73,95%CI 0.61 至 0.88)。

结论

被近乎随机分配到社会经济地位不同的县的人群经历了不同水平的死亡率。在贫困程度最高的地区,死亡率最高。以前描述这种死亡率与地区贫困之间正相关关系的研究不能区分组成和背景效应。因此,我们的发现表明,就死亡率而言,地区贫困确实很重要。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验