Kobulnik Jeremy, Delgado Diego
Toronto General Hospital/University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2012 Sep;10(9):1119-32. doi: 10.1586/erc.12.109.
Over the past 5 years, researchers have examined the utility of many experimental heart failure biomarkers that are not yet widely adopted clinically, to complement the role of B-type natriuretic peptide and its precursor. Candidate biomarkers have been identified from several different pathophysiologic categories, including markers of inflammation, myocyte necrosis, renal dysfunction, neurohumoral activation, oxidative stress and raised intracardiac pressure. Indeed, some biomarkers provide prognostic information that is independent of information obtained from conventional clinical and biomarker assessment. Moreover, some biomarkers studied help to identify dominant pathology that may predict responsiveness to specific therapies. Preliminary data also suggest a potential role for the development of comprehensive biomarker profiling models, integrating biomarkers from several categories to refine risk assessment.
在过去5年里,研究人员已对许多尚未在临床上广泛应用的实验性心力衰竭生物标志物的效用进行了研究,以补充B型利钠肽及其前体的作用。候选生物标志物已从几个不同的病理生理类别中被识别出来,包括炎症标志物、心肌细胞坏死标志物、肾功能障碍标志物、神经体液激活标志物、氧化应激标志物和心内压升高标志物。事实上,一些生物标志物提供的预后信息独立于从传统临床和生物标志物评估中获得的信息。此外,一些所研究的生物标志物有助于识别可能预测对特定治疗反应性的主要病理情况。初步数据还表明,综合生物标志物谱模型的开发具有潜在作用,即将来自几个类别的生物标志物整合起来以优化风险评估。