Yale Child Study Center, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA.
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2013 Jul;37(6):1162-71. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.09.008. Epub 2012 Oct 23.
We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized, placebo-controlled trials to determine the efficacy of antipsychotic and alpha-2 agonists in the treatment of chronic tic disorders and examine moderators of treatment effect. Meta-analysis demonstrated a significant benefit of antipsychotics compared to placebo (standardized mean difference (SMD)=0.58 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.36-0.80). Stratified subgroup analysis found no significant difference in the efficacy of the 4 antipsychotic agents tested (risperidone, pimozide, haloperidol and ziprasidone). Meta-analysis also demonstrated a benefit of alpha-2 agonists compared to placebo (SMD=0.31 (95% confidence interval CI: 0.15-0.48). Stratified subgroup analysis and meta-regression demonstrated a significant moderating effect of co-occurring ADHD. Trials which enrolled subjects with tics and ADHD demonstrated a medium-to-large effect (SMD=0.68 (95%CI: 0.36-1.01) whereas trials that excluded subjects with ADHD demonstrated a small, non-significant benefit (SMD=0.15 (95%CI: -0.06 to 0.36). Our findings demonstrated significant benefit of both antipsychotics and alpha-2 agonists in treating tics but suggest alpha-2 agonists may have minimal benefit in tic patients without ADHD.
我们进行了一项荟萃分析,对随机、安慰剂对照试验进行分析,以确定抗精神病药和 α-2 激动剂治疗慢性抽动障碍的疗效,并检查治疗效果的调节因素。荟萃分析显示,与安慰剂相比,抗精神病药具有显著的疗效优势(标准化均数差(SMD)=0.58(95%置信区间(CI):0.36-0.80))。分层亚组分析发现,四种测试的抗精神病药物(利培酮、匹莫齐特、氟哌啶醇和齐拉西酮)的疗效无显著差异。荟萃分析还显示,与安慰剂相比,α-2 激动剂具有显著的疗效优势(SMD=0.31(95%置信区间 CI:0.15-0.48))。分层亚组分析和荟萃回归显示,共病 ADHD 有显著的调节作用。纳入抽动和 ADHD 患者的试验显示出中等至大的效果(SMD=0.68(95%CI:0.36-1.01)),而排除 ADHD 患者的试验则显示出较小的、无显著益处(SMD=0.15(95%CI:-0.06 至 0.36))。我们的研究结果表明,抗精神病药和 α-2 激动剂在治疗抽动方面均有显著益处,但提示 α-2 激动剂在无 ADHD 的抽动患者中可能益处有限。