Suppr超能文献

结核病医疗服务融入综合医院是否能提高结核病护理质量?来自中国的案例研究证据。

Does the integration of TB medical services in the general hospital improve the quality of TB care? Evidence from a case study in China.

机构信息

Center for Health Management and Policy, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China.

出版信息

J Public Health (Oxf). 2013 Jun;35(2):322-8. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fds089. Epub 2012 Oct 26.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Moving the clinical services from tuberculosis (TB) dispensary to the integrated county hospital (called integrated approach) has been practiced in China; however, it is unknown the quality of TB care in the integrated approach and in the dispensary approach.

METHODS

A total of 202 new TB patients were investigated using structured questionnaires in three counties implementing the integrated approach and one county implementing the dispensary approach. The quality of TB care is measured based on success rate of treatment, medical expenditure, health system delay and second-line drug use.

RESULTS

The integrated approach showed a high success treatment rate. The medical expenditure in the integrated approach was USD 432, significantly lower than that in the dispensary approach (Z = -5.771, P < 0.001). The integrated approach had a shorter health system delay (5 days) than the dispensary approach (32 days). Twenty-six percent of patients in integrated hospitals were prescribed with second-line TB drugs, significantly lower than that in the TB dispensary (47%, χ(2) = 7.452, P = 0.006). However, the medical expenditure, use of second-line anti-TB drug and liver-protection drugs indeed varied greatly across the three integrated hospitals.

CONCLUSIONS

The integrated approach showed better quality of TB care, but the performance of the integrated hospitals varied greatly. A method to standardize TB treatment and management of this approach is urgent.

摘要

背景

将临床服务从结核病(TB)门诊部转移到综合县级医院(称为综合方法)在中国已经实施;然而,尚不清楚综合方法和门诊部方法中的结核病护理质量。

方法

在实施综合方法的三个县和实施门诊部方法的一个县,共调查了 202 名新的结核病患者,采用结构化问卷。根据治疗成功率、医疗支出、卫生系统延迟和二线药物使用情况来衡量结核病护理质量。

结果

综合方法显示出较高的治疗成功率。综合方法的医疗支出为 432 美元,明显低于门诊部方法(Z = -5.771,P < 0.001)。综合方法的卫生系统延迟(5 天)短于门诊部方法(32 天)。26%的综合医院患者开具了二线结核病药物,明显低于结核病门诊部(47%,χ² = 7.452,P = 0.006)。然而,综合医院的医疗支出、二线抗结核药物和保肝药物的使用确实差异很大。

结论

综合方法显示出更好的结核病护理质量,但综合医院的表现差异很大。急需制定一种规范这种方法的结核病治疗和管理方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验