Unit of Mycology and Parasitology, Department of Microbiology and Infection Control, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark.
J Clin Microbiol. 2013 Jan;51(1):190-4. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02541-12. Epub 2012 Oct 31.
Blastocystis is the most common nonfungal microeukaryote of the human intestinal tract and comprises numerous subtypes (STs), nine of which have been found in humans (ST1 to ST9). While efforts continue to explore the relationship between human health status and subtypes, no consensus regarding subtyping methodology exists. It has been speculated that differences detected in subtype distribution in various cohorts may to some extent reflect different approaches. Blastocystis subtypes have been determined primarily in one of two ways: (i) sequencing of small subunit rRNA gene (SSU-rDNA) PCR products and (ii) PCR with subtype-specific sequence-tagged-site (STS) diagnostic primers. Here, STS primers were evaluated against a panel of samples (n = 58) already subtyped by SSU-rDNA sequencing (barcode region), including subtypes for which STS primers are not available, and a small panel of DNAs from four other eukaryotes often present in feces (n = 18). Although the STS primers appeared to be highly specific, their sensitivity was only moderate, and the results indicated that some infections may go undetected when this method is used. False-negative STS results were not linked exclusively to certain subtypes or alleles, and evidence of substantial genetic variation in STS loci was obtained. Since the majority of DNAs included here were extracted from feces, it is possible that STS primers may generally work better with DNAs extracted from Blastocystis cultures. In conclusion, due to its higher applicability and sensitivity, and since sequence information is useful for other forms of research, SSU-rDNA barcoding is recommended as the method of choice for Blastocystis subtyping.
芽囊原虫是人类肠道中最常见的非真菌微真核生物,包含多个亚型(ST),其中 9 种已在人类中发现(ST1 至 ST9)。虽然人们一直在努力探索人类健康状况与亚型之间的关系,但对于亚类分型方法尚未达成共识。据推测,在不同队列中检测到的亚型分布差异在某种程度上可能反映了不同的方法。芽囊原虫亚型主要通过以下两种方式确定:(i)小亚基 rRNA 基因(SSU-rDNA)PCR 产物测序和(ii)使用与亚型特异性序列标记位点(STS)诊断引物的 PCR。在这里,STS 引物针对一组已经通过 SSU-rDNA 测序(条形码区域)进行亚分型的样品(n=58)进行了评估,包括没有 STS 引物的亚型,以及来自粪便中经常存在的其他四个真核生物的一小部分 DNA(n=18)。尽管 STS 引物似乎具有高度特异性,但它们的敏感性仅为中等水平,结果表明,当使用这种方法时,某些感染可能无法被检测到。STS 结果为假阴性并不仅与某些亚型或等位基因有关,并且在 STS 基因座中获得了大量遗传变异的证据。由于这里包含的大多数 DNA 是从粪便中提取的,因此 STS 引物可能通常更适合从芽囊原虫培养物中提取的 DNA。总之,由于其更高的适用性和敏感性,并且由于序列信息对其他形式的研究很有用,因此建议将 SSU-rDNA 条形码作为芽囊原虫亚类分型的首选方法。