Sanchez Benito
Department of Medical Oncology, Nucleo de Especialidades Oncologicas, Homero 443, Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico 44670.
Clin Med Insights Case Rep. 2012;5:137-41. doi: 10.4137/CCRep.S8825. Epub 2012 Oct 15.
Intravenous zoledronic acid (ZOL) is an integral component for the management of patients with bone metastases, but can be associated with transient flu-like symptoms, which generally occur only with the first infusion and are typically manageable with nonprescription analgesics. A 50-year-old woman with a bone metastasis secondary to breast cancer received radiation therapy, brand-name ZOL (Zometa(®)), and letrozole. During the first 3 cycles of Zometa (4 mg every 3-4 weeks), no acute adverse events were reported. For the next 2 cycles she was switched to generic ZOL and experienced severe toxicity (nausea, vomiting, extreme weakness, and incapacitating bone pain) that required hospitalization. Toxicity differences between generic ZOL and Zometa led the patient to pay additional costs for Zometa, and subsequent Zometa infusions were without incident. This is the first case report documenting a clinically significant difference between the safety profiles of a generic formulation of ZOL and brand-name Zometa.
静脉注射唑来膦酸(ZOL)是治疗骨转移患者的重要组成部分,但可能会伴有短暂的流感样症状,这些症状通常仅在首次输注时出现,一般使用非处方镇痛药即可控制。一名50岁的乳腺癌继发骨转移女性接受了放射治疗、使用了原研药唑来膦酸(择泰(Zometa®))和来曲唑。在使用择泰的前3个周期(每3 - 4周4毫克),未报告急性不良事件。接下来的2个周期,她改用了唑来膦酸仿制药,并出现了严重毒性反应(恶心、呕吐、极度虚弱和使人丧失能力的骨痛),需要住院治疗。唑来膦酸仿制药和择泰之间的毒性差异导致患者为择泰支付了额外费用,随后使用择泰输注未再出现问题。这是第一例记录唑来膦酸仿制药和原研药择泰安全性存在临床显著差异的病例报告。