Colaco Marc, Johnson Kelly, Schneider Dona, Barone Joseph
Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ 08854, USA.
Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2013 Jan;52(1):49-53. doi: 10.1177/0009922812464042. Epub 2012 Nov 1.
Toilet training is an important marker of physical and psychosocial development, but the best strategy for implementing training is still unknown. The purpose of this study is to compare dysfunctional voiding outcomes for 2 common toilet training strategies: parent-oriented training and child-oriented training.
This study was completed using a case-control design, with participants between the ages of 4 and 12 years. All participants were asked to complete questionnaires related to demographics and toilet training method. Results were then analyzed between cases and controls.
In all, 215 patients with a mean age 7.76 years participated in this study. Cases and controls showed no significant difference for demographic measures and socioeconomic status. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in dysfunctional voiding between toilet training methods.
Toilet training method does not seem to have any long-term effect on dysfunctional voiding. As such, clinicians should advise parents that both methods are acceptable.
如厕训练是身体和心理社会发展的一个重要标志，但实施训练的最佳策略仍不明确。本研究的目的是比较两种常见如厕训练策略的排尿功能障碍结果：以家长为导向的训练和以儿童为导向的训练。
本研究采用病例对照设计完成，参与者年龄在4至12岁之间。所有参与者均被要求完成与人口统计学和如厕训练方法相关的问卷。然后对病例组和对照组的结果进行分析。
共有215名平均年龄为7.76岁的患者参与了本研究。病例组和对照组在人口统计学指标和社会经济地位方面无显著差异。此外，如厕训练方法之间在排尿功能障碍方面也无显著差异。
如厕训练方法似乎对排尿功能障碍没有任何长期影响。因此，临床医生应告知家长这两种方法都是可以接受的。
