• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

根据巴西心脏病学会指南,经胸超声心动图的需求不足。

Inadequate request of transthoracic echocardiography according to the guidelines of the Brazilian Society of Cardiology.

机构信息

Hospital Universitário Antônio Pedro, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói.

出版信息

Arq Bras Cardiol. 2012 Oct;99(4):952-4. doi: 10.1590/s0066-782x2012001300012.

DOI:10.1590/s0066-782x2012001300012
PMID:23117553
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Guidelines from medical societies suggest recommendations for the appropriate request of tests. In 2009, the Brazilian Society of Cardiology (BSC) published new guidelines for transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) request.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the prevalence of Class III requests for TTE, as defined by the BSC Guidelines and analyze these requests profile comparing a public university hospital (PUH) with a private cardiology hospital (PCH).

METHODS

We prospectively evaluated 779 consecutive outpatient TTE requests: 391 from the PCH and 388 from the PUH between December 2009 and May 2010. The indications studied were classified accordingly to the BSC guidelines. Request distribution was compared by Chi-square test. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

RESULTS

Of the 779 requests, 61 (7.8%) were considered Class III. Of these 14 were from the public and 47 from the private hospital. The distribution of requests was statistically different between institutions (p < 0.001). Check-up in asymptomatic patients was the main inadequate indication, with 37 cases (33 in the private institution- 89.18%), followed by evaluation after angioplasty in 9 cases (8 in the private institution - 88.88%); ventricular function monitoring in patients with stable heart failure in 6 cases (4 in the public institution - 66.66%), post-bypass surgery in 5 cases (4 in the private institution- 80%), and evaluation of nonspecific electrocardiographic abnormalities in 4 cases (4 in the public institution - 100%).

CONCLUSION

Asymptomatic patients' assessment was the main cause of inadequate TTE requests, which differs between institutions: routine check-up in the private and heart failure in the public hospital.

摘要

背景

医学协会的指南建议对适当的检查请求提出建议。2009 年,巴西心脏病学会(BSC)发布了新的经胸超声心动图(TTE)请求指南。

目的

评估 BSC 指南定义的 TTE 类 III 请求的流行率,并分析这些请求的特征,比较一家公立医院(PUH)和一家私立心脏病医院(PCH)。

方法

我们前瞻性评估了 779 例连续门诊 TTE 请求:2009 年 12 月至 2010 年 5 月,PCH 391 例,PUH 388 例。研究的适应症根据 BSC 指南进行分类。通过卡方检验比较请求分布。统计学意义设为 p<0.05。

结果

779 份请求中,61 份(7.8%)被认为是类 III 。其中 14 份来自公立,47 份来自私立医院。机构间请求分布存在统计学差异(p<0.001)。无症状患者的检查是主要的不适当适应症,有 37 例(私立医院 33 例-89.18%),其次是经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后评估 9 例(私立医院 8 例-88.88%);稳定心力衰竭患者心室功能监测 6 例(公立 4 例-66.66%),旁路手术后 5 例(私立 4 例-80%),非特异性心电图异常评估 4 例(公立 4 例-100%)。

结论

无症状患者评估是 TTE 请求不适当的主要原因,不同机构之间存在差异:私立医院常规检查,公立医院心力衰竭。

相似文献

1
Inadequate request of transthoracic echocardiography according to the guidelines of the Brazilian Society of Cardiology.根据巴西心脏病学会指南,经胸超声心动图的需求不足。
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2012 Oct;99(4):952-4. doi: 10.1590/s0066-782x2012001300012.
2
Comparison of echocardiography request appropriateness between public and private hospitals.公立和私立医院之间超声心动图申请适宜性的比较。
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2011 Oct;97(4):281-8. doi: 10.1590/s0066-782x2011005000106. Epub 2011 Oct 21.
3
Application of 2011 American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Society of Echocardiography appropriateness use criteria in hospitalized patients referred for transthoracic echocardiography in a community setting.2011 年美国心脏病学会基金会/美国超声心动图学会适宜性使用标准在社区环境中因经胸超声心动图检查而住院的患者中的应用。
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2012 Jun;25(6):589-98. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2012.03.006. Epub 2012 May 3.
4
Prospective evaluation of the clinical application of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Society of Echocardiography Appropriateness Criteria for transthoracic echocardiography.美国心脏病学基金会/美国超声心动图学会经胸超声心动图适用标准临床应用的前瞻性评估。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2008 Sep;1(5):663-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2008.07.004.
5
Appropriate use of transthoracic echocardiography.经胸超声心动图的合理应用。
Am J Cardiol. 2010 Jun 1;105(11):1640-2. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.01.026.
6
Appropriateness of use criteria for transthoracic echocardiography: are they relevant outside the USA?经胸超声心动图使用指征的适宜性:这些指征在美国以外的地区适用吗?
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014 Apr;15(4):450-5. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jet186. Epub 2013 Oct 22.
7
[Transthoracic echocardiography in a heart institute in Abidjan (Ivory Coast): Indications and evaluation of the request appropriateness].[阿比让(科特迪瓦)一家心脏机构的经胸超声心动图检查:检查指征及申请合理性评估]
Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris). 2014 Feb;63(1):1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ancard.2013.04.015. Epub 2013 May 22.
8
The association of abnormal findings on transthoracic echocardiography with 2011 Appropriate Use Criteria and clinical impact.经胸超声心动图异常发现与2011年合理使用标准及临床影响的关联
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Mar;31(3):521-8. doi: 10.1007/s10554-014-0582-x. Epub 2015 Jan 23.
9
Application of Appropriate Use Criteria for Initial Transthoracic Echocardiography in an Academic Outpatient Pediatric Cardiology Program.学术性门诊儿科心脏病学项目中初始经胸超声心动图合理使用标准的应用
Pediatr Cardiol. 2017 Aug;38(6):1282-1287. doi: 10.1007/s00246-017-1659-9. Epub 2017 Jul 7.
10
Comparison of the clinical application of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Society of Echocardiography Appropriateness Criteria for outpatient transthoracic echocardiography in academic and community practice settings.美国心脏病学院基金会/美国超声心动图学会适宜性标准在学术和社区实践环境中外周门诊经胸超声心动图临床应用的比较。
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2009 Dec;22(12):1375-81. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2009.08.005. Epub 2009 Sep 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Low prevalence of relevant findings in inappropriate echocardiograms and discordant perceptions between cardiologists and patients.不适当超声心动图中相关发现的低发生率以及心脏病专家与患者之间的不一致认知。
Braz J Med Biol Res. 2018;51(8):e7413. doi: 10.1590/1414-431x20187413. Epub 2018 May 28.