Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA.
Behav Med. 2012;38(4):115-20. doi: 10.1080/08964289.2012.693976.
The "dual effects" hypothesis argues that social control can be effective in promoting positive health-related behavior change, but it can also jeopardize the targeted individual's well-being. This hypothesis is tested using hemoglobin A1C as an objective indicator of behavioral compliance with diabetes self-management behavior and depressive symptoms. Differences in the effects of social control on A1C and depressive symptoms by sex and ethnicity are tested. Cross-sectional data were obtained from a multi-ethnic sample of older adults with diabetes (N = 593). Greater social control was associated with poorer rather than better odds of achieving glucose control, and with greater depressive symptoms. There was no evidence that social control has differential effects on either glucose control or depressive symptoms by sex or ethnicity. Active use of social control attempts by family members and friends, especially if they are coercive or punitive in nature, are likely counterproductive for maintaining the physical and mental health of older adults with diabetes.
“双重效应”假说认为,社会控制可以有效地促进积极的与健康相关的行为改变,但也可能危及目标个体的福祉。本研究使用糖化血红蛋白(HbA1C)作为衡量糖尿病自我管理行为和抑郁症状的行为依从性的客观指标来验证这一假说。检验了社会控制对 HbA1C 和抑郁症状的影响在性别和种族上的差异。本研究使用横断面数据,对来自具有不同种族的老年糖尿病患者(N=593)的多民族样本进行了研究。更大的社会控制与实现血糖控制的机会较差而不是较好相关,与更多的抑郁症状相关。没有证据表明社会控制对血糖控制或抑郁症状有性别或种族差异的影响。家庭成员和朋友积极使用社会控制手段,特别是如果这些手段具有强制性或惩罚性,可能会适得其反,不利于维持老年糖尿病患者的身心健康。