Suppr超能文献

床边监测调整经皮冠状动脉介入治疗术后抗血小板治疗。

Bedside monitoring to adjust antiplatelet therapy for coronary stenting.

机构信息

Institut de Cardiologie Hôpital Pitié–Salpêtrière and Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France.

出版信息

N Engl J Med. 2012 Nov 29;367(22):2100-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1209979. Epub 2012 Nov 4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients' responses to oral antiplatelet therapy are subject to variation. Bedside monitoring offers the opportunity to improve outcomes after coronary stenting by individualizing therapy.

METHODS

We randomly assigned 2440 patients scheduled for coronary stenting at 38 centers to a strategy of platelet-function monitoring, with drug adjustment in patients who had a poor response to antiplatelet therapy, or to a conventional strategy without monitoring and drug adjustment. The primary end point was the composite of death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, stroke, or urgent revascularization 1 year after stent implantation. For patients in the monitoring group, the VerifyNow P2Y12 and aspirin point-of-care assays were used in the catheterization laboratory before stent implantation and in the outpatient clinic 2 to 4 weeks later.

RESULTS

In the monitoring group, high platelet reactivity in patients taking clopidogrel (34.5% of patients) or aspirin (7.6%) led to the administration of an additional bolus of clopidogrel, prasugrel, or aspirin along with glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors during the procedure. The primary end point occurred in 34.6% of the patients in the monitoring group, as compared with 31.1% of those in the conventional-treatment group (hazard ratio, 1.13; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.98 to 1.29; P=0.10). The main secondary end point, stent thrombosis or any urgent revascularization, occurred in 4.9% of the patients in the monitoring group and 4.6% of those in the conventional-treatment group (hazard ratio, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.74 to 1.52; P=0.77). The rate of major bleeding events did not differ significantly between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed no significant improvements in clinical outcomes with platelet-function monitoring and treatment adjustment for coronary stenting, as compared with standard antiplatelet therapy without monitoring. (Funded by Allies in Cardiovascular Trials Initiatives and Organized Networks and others; ARCTIC ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00827411.).

摘要

背景

患者对口服抗血小板治疗的反应存在差异。床边监测通过个体化治疗为冠状动脉支架置入术后提供了改善预后的机会。

方法

我们在 38 个中心将 2440 例计划接受冠状动脉支架置入术的患者随机分为血小板功能监测策略组,对药物治疗反应不佳的患者进行药物调整,或分为常规策略组(不监测和药物调整)。主要终点是支架置入后 1 年死亡、心肌梗死、支架血栓形成、卒中和紧急血运重建的复合终点。对于监测组的患者,在支架置入前于导管室和 2 至 4 周后于门诊使用 VerifyNow P2Y12 和阿司匹林即时检测法进行检测。

结果

在监测组中,服用氯吡格雷的患者(34.5%的患者)或阿司匹林(7.6%的患者)的血小板高反应性导致在手术期间给予额外的氯吡格雷、普拉格雷或阿司匹林负荷剂量,以及糖蛋白 IIb/IIIa 抑制剂。监测组中 34.6%的患者发生主要终点事件,而常规治疗组中这一比例为 31.1%(风险比,1.13;95%置信区间[CI],0.98 至 1.29;P=0.10)。监测组中有 4.9%的患者发生支架血栓形成或任何紧急血运重建,而常规治疗组中有 4.6%的患者发生该事件(风险比,1.06;95%CI,0.74 至 1.52;P=0.77)。两组间大出血事件发生率无显著差异。

结论

与不监测的标准抗血小板治疗相比,血小板功能监测和治疗调整对冠状动脉支架置入术的临床结局没有显著改善。(由 Allies in Cardiovascular Trials Initiatives 和 Organized Networks 等资助;ARCTIC ClinicalTrials.gov 编号,NCT00827411)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验