Suppr超能文献

冠状动脉支架置入术后三联抗血小板治疗与双联抗血小板治疗:对支架内血栓形成的影响

Triple versus dual antiplatelet therapy after coronary stenting: impact on stent thrombosis.

作者信息

Lee Seung-Whan, Park Seong-Wook, Hong Myeong-Ki, Kim Young-Hak, Lee Bong-Ki, Song Jong-Min, Han Ki Hoon, Lee Cheol Whan, Kang Duk-Hyun, Song Jae-Kwan, Kim Jae-Joong, Park Seung-Jung

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Nov 15;46(10):1833-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.07.048. Epub 2005 Oct 19.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We evaluated safety and efficacy of triple antiplatelet therapy with aspirin, clopidogrel, or ticlopidine and cilostazol after coronary stenting.

BACKGROUND

Triple antiplatelet therapy might have beneficial effect to prevent thrombotic complications in patients undergoing coronary stenting.

METHODS

Patients undergoing successful coronary stenting were divided into dual antiplatelet therapy (aspirin plus clopidogrel or ticlopidine, group I, n = 1,597) and triple antiplatelet therapy (aspirin plus clopidogrel or ticlopidine plus cilostazol, group II, n = 1,415) groups. The primary end point included death, myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization, or stent thrombosis within 30 days. The secondary end point was side effects of study drugs, including major bleeding, vascular complication, hepatic dysfunction, and hematological complications.

RESULTS

Multi-vessel stenting and the use of long stents were more prevalent in group II than in group I. The primary end point was 0.8% in group I and 0.3% in group II (p = 0.085). Stent thrombosis within 30 days was significantly lower in group II (n = 1, 0.1%) than in group I (n = 9, 0.5%; p = 0.024). The independent predictors of stent thrombosis were primary stenting (odds ratio [OR] 7.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.0 to 30.8, p = 0.003) and triple therapy (OR 0.12, 95% CI 0.015 to 0.98, p = 0.048). The overall adverse drug effects, including major bleeding, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia, were no different between two groups (1.8% vs. 2.6%, p = 0.104).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with the dual antiplatelet regimen, triple antiplatelet therapy seemed to be more effective in preventing thrombotic complications after stenting without an increased risk of side effects. Triple antiplatelet therapy might be safely applied in patients or lesions with a high risk of stent thrombosis.

摘要

目的

我们评估了冠状动脉支架置入术后使用阿司匹林、氯吡格雷或噻氯匹定与西洛他唑进行三联抗血小板治疗的安全性和有效性。

背景

三联抗血小板治疗可能对预防冠状动脉支架置入术患者的血栓形成并发症具有有益作用。

方法

将成功进行冠状动脉支架置入术的患者分为双联抗血小板治疗组(阿司匹林加氯吡格雷或噻氯匹定,第一组,n = 1597)和三联抗血小板治疗组(阿司匹林加氯吡格雷或噻氯匹定加西洛他唑,第二组,n = 1415)。主要终点包括30天内的死亡、心肌梗死、靶病变血管重建或支架血栓形成。次要终点是研究药物的副作用,包括大出血、血管并发症、肝功能障碍和血液学并发症。

结果

与第一组相比,第二组多支血管支架置入和长支架的使用更为普遍。第一组的主要终点为0.8%,第二组为0.3%(p = 0.085)。第二组30天内的支架血栓形成明显低于第一组(n = 1,0.1% 对比 n = 9,0.5%;p = 0.024)。支架血栓形成的独立预测因素是初次支架置入(比值比[OR] 7.9,95%置信区间[CI] 2.0至30.8,p = 0.003)和三联治疗(OR 0.12,95% CI 0.015至0.98,p = 0.048)。两组之间包括大出血、中性粒细胞减少和血小板减少在内的总体药物不良反应无差异(1.8% 对比 2.6%,p = 0.104)。

结论

与双联抗血小板方案相比,三联抗血小板治疗在预防支架置入术后血栓形成并发症方面似乎更有效,且副作用风险未增加。三联抗血小板治疗可安全应用于具有高支架血栓形成风险的患者或病变。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验