Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, University of Maryland, School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Neurosci Lett. 2013 Jan 15;533:65-70. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2012.10.048. Epub 2012 Nov 2.
The effect of postural orientation on the motor corticospinal excitability (MCE) of proximal and distal upper extremity (UE) muscles was investigated. In a crossover design, recruitment curves (RCs), short interval cortical inhibition (SICI) and intracortical facilitation (ICF) of resting anterior deltoid (AD) and first dorsal interosseus (FDI) was assessed in two postures: sitting and standing. Six healthy adults without contraindications to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) participated in the study. TMS was applied over the motor cortical representation of FDI and AD at intensities ranging from 90% to 200% of resting motor threshold (RMT) in increments of 10%. SICI and ICF were assessed for each muscle using a conditioning stimulus (80% RMT) preceding a test stimulus (120% RMT) with an interstimulus interval of 2 ms and 15 ms, respectively. For AD, but not FDI, there was a significant and consistent increase in RC slope during standing compared to sitting. For FDI, there was no difference in ICF and SICI between sitting and standing. However, for AD, while there was no difference in ICF between the two postures, there was a clear trend for SICI to decrease (p=0.06) in standing compared to sitting. These results indicate that postural change from sitting to standing, affects the MCE of proximal but not distal muscles. While this indicates the role of proximal UE muscles in postural control, it also implies that rehabilitation protocols for enhancing proximal arm motor function may be advantaged if administered in a standing posture.
研究了姿势定位对近端和远端上肢(UE)肌肉运动皮质兴奋性(MCE)的影响。采用交叉设计,在两种姿势(坐姿和站立位)下评估了 6 名健康成年人(无经颅磁刺激(TMS)禁忌)静息前三角肌(AD)和第一背侧骨间肌(FDI)的募集曲线(RCs)、短程皮质抑制(SICI)和皮质内易化(ICF)。TMS 施加于 FDI 和 AD 的运动皮质代表区,刺激强度从 90%到 200%的静息运动阈值(RMT)递增 10%。使用刺激间隔分别为 2ms 和 15ms 的前置刺激(80%RMT)和测试刺激(120%RMT)评估 SICI 和 ICF。与坐姿相比,站立时 AD 的 RC 斜率明显且持续增加,但 FDI 则不然。对于 FDI,坐姿和站位之间的 ICF 和 SICI 没有差异。然而,对于 AD,虽然两种姿势之间的 ICF 没有差异,但 SICI 有明显的趋势在站立时减少(p=0.06)。这些结果表明,从坐姿到站立的姿势变化会影响近端而不是远端肌肉的 MCE。这表明近端 UE 肌肉在姿势控制中的作用,但也意味着如果在站立位进行近端臂运动功能增强的康复方案可能会更有利。