Suppr超能文献

英国初级保健实践中患者共享决策的体验。

Patients' experiences of shared decision making in primary care practices in the United kingdom.

机构信息

National Primary Care Research & Development Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, England (CF)

Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, England (CF)

出版信息

Med Decis Making. 2013 Jan;33(1):26-36. doi: 10.1177/0272989X12464825. Epub 2012 Nov 5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Shared decision making (SDM) and patient self-management support are key components of US and UK policy for chronic disease management, whereby SDM is seen as enhancing physician-patient negotiation around self-management. The WISE trial is implementing training in self-management support for primary care physicians in one UK region. This article describes preintervention levels of patient-reported SDM and explores how this varies with patient and practice characteristics.

METHODS

We analyzed baseline data from a cluster randomized controlled trial for 2965 patients with diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) from 29 family practices. Patient-level measures included self-report of chronic conditions, SDM (Health Care Climate Questionnaire [HCCQ]), health status, and demographic characteristics. Area and practice characteristics included chronic disease workload and socioeconomic deprivation.

RESULTS

The mean SDM score was 75 (out of 100), but the range was wide. The mean score was lower for IBS patients but did not vary with other disease conditions. Younger patients and those with poorer health status reported lower degrees of SDM. No associations were found with practice characteristics.

LIMITATIONS

The study was restricted to one socioeconomically deprived region, and hence results may not be nationally representative of the United Kingdom. Ceiling effects on SDM scores may limit the utility of the HCCQ.

CONCLUSIONS

Lower ratings from some patient groups may reflect differences in expectations rather than differences in physician behavior. Overall levels of SDM were high, and no patient or practice characteristic represented a serious barrier to SDM. However, we cannot say to what extent SDM in this chronic population addressed self-management issues rather than clinical care. More nuanced measures of SDM are required that distinguish between different forms of care.

摘要

背景

共享决策(SDM)和患者自我管理支持是美国和英国慢性病管理政策的关键组成部分,SDM 被视为增强医患双方围绕自我管理进行协商的手段。WISE 试验正在英国的一个地区为初级保健医生实施自我管理支持培训。本文描述了预先干预的患者报告 SDM 水平,并探讨了这种水平如何因患者和实践特征而异。

方法

我们分析了来自 29 个家庭实践的 2965 名患有糖尿病、慢性阻塞性肺疾病和肠易激综合征(IBS)的患者的一项基于群组的随机对照试验的基线数据。患者层面的测量包括慢性病自我报告、SDM(医疗保健气候问卷[HCCQ])、健康状况和人口统计学特征。区域和实践特征包括慢性病工作量和社会经济剥夺程度。

结果

SDM 的平均得分是 75 分(满分 100 分),但范围很广。IBS 患者的平均得分较低,但与其他疾病状况无关。年轻患者和健康状况较差的患者报告的 SDM 程度较低。与实践特征没有关联。

局限性

该研究仅限于一个社会经济贫困地区,因此结果可能无法代表英国全国范围。SDM 得分的上限效应可能限制 HCCQ 的实用性。

结论

一些患者群体的评分较低可能反映了期望的差异,而不是医生行为的差异。总体而言,SDM 水平较高,没有患者或实践特征代表 SDM 的严重障碍。然而,我们无法确定在这个慢性人群中,SDM 在多大程度上解决了自我管理问题,而不是临床护理问题。需要更细致的 SDM 衡量标准,以区分不同形式的护理。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验