Hart S E
College of Nursing, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996-4110.
J Prof Nurs. 1990 Jan-Feb;6(1):55-8. doi: 10.1016/s8755-7223(05)80190-5.
This article examines the legitimacy of baccalaureate and higher degree nursing programs being offered by single-purpose institutions. The arguments in support of and in opposition to the concept are analyzed and discussed. The American Association of Colleges of Nursing position statement on single-purpose institutions is reviewed. The author concludes that there is no inherent flaw in the concept of single-purpose institutions as an appropriate vehicle for delivery of nursing education programs. She further concludes that those programs that have successfully completed the rigorous reviews associated with institutional and specialized accreditation have, in that process, earned the right to be recognized and respected as legitimate members of the higher education community.
本文探讨了由单一用途机构提供的护理学学士及更高学位项目的合理性。对支持和反对这一概念的论点进行了分析和讨论。回顾了美国护理学院协会关于单一用途机构的立场声明。作者得出结论,单一用途机构作为提供护理教育项目的合适载体这一概念没有内在缺陷。她进一步得出结论,那些成功完成与机构和专业认证相关的严格审查的项目,在此过程中赢得了被认可和尊重为高等教育界合法成员的权利。