• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[孕期使用汞柱静脉阻塞体积描记法对静脉流入和流出的研究]

[Study of venous inflow and outflow using mercury gauge venous occlusion plethysmography during pregnancy].

作者信息

Lermusiaux P, Derriennic H, Castellani L

机构信息

Service de Chirurgie Cardio-vasculaire, Hôpital Trousseau, Tours.

出版信息

J Mal Vasc. 1990;15(1):26-9.

PMID:2313208
Abstract

Changes due to hormone activity and caval compression by the uterus were noted in venous hemodynamics of the lower limbs during pregnancy. The purpose of the study was to search for a possible incidence of these modifications on venous inflow ant outflow during mercury strain gauge plethysmography (fig. 1). A total of 183 subjects were distributed into 4 groups: (table I) nonpregnant women of childbearing age (controls = C) and women of the first (G1), second (G2) and third (G3) trimesters of gestation. Women with a history of phlebitis or pronounced varicosis were excluded. The figures for venous filling (table II, III et IV) (delta V) were 3.2 (C), 3.1 (G1), 2.64 (G2) and 2.04 (G3). There was a significant (P less than 0.001) reduction in G3 (and left-sided G2) delta V compared to that of controls. Maximum venous outflow (MVO) was 125.3 (G1), 123.7 (G2) and 123.5 (G3), showing no significant difference with controls (125.1). It is concluded that no significant change in MVO occurred during pregnancy, whereas there was a decrease in delta approximately greater than V during the third trimester. These results suggest that the latter parameter should not be considered as a criterion for diagnosis of phlebitis in the pregnant woman.

摘要

孕期下肢静脉血流动力学变化与激素活性及子宫对下腔静脉的压迫有关。本研究旨在探寻这些改变在汞应变容积描记法(图1)中对静脉流入和流出的可能影响。总共183名受试者被分为4组:(表I)育龄非孕妇(对照组 = C)以及妊娠第一(G1)、第二(G2)和第三(G3)孕期的女性。有静脉炎病史或明显静脉曲张的女性被排除。静脉充盈数据(表II、III和IV)(ΔV)分别为3.2(C)、3.1(G1)、2.64(G2)和2.04(G3)。与对照组相比,G3(以及左侧G2)的ΔV显著降低(P < 0.001)。最大静脉流出量(MVO)分别为125.3(G1)、123.7(G2)和123.5(G3),与对照组(125.1)无显著差异。结论是孕期MVO无显著变化,而在妊娠晚期ΔV约有下降。这些结果表明,后一参数不应被视为孕妇静脉炎诊断的标准。

相似文献

1
[Study of venous inflow and outflow using mercury gauge venous occlusion plethysmography during pregnancy].[孕期使用汞柱静脉阻塞体积描记法对静脉流入和流出的研究]
J Mal Vasc. 1990;15(1):26-9.
2
[Effects of surgical stress on peripheral venous functions].[手术应激对周围静脉功能的影响]
Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi. 1992 Mar;93(3):314-21.
3
[The flow-volume curve. Expression of emptying as a function of venous distensibility].[流量-容积曲线。排空作为静脉扩张性函数的表达]
J Mal Vasc. 1987;12(2):162-7.
4
Characteristics of the venous hemodynamics of the leg under simulated weightlessness: effects of physical exercise as countermeasure.模拟失重状态下腿部静脉血流动力学特征:体育锻炼作为应对措施的效果
Aviat Space Environ Med. 1995 Jun;66(6):542-9.
5
[Strain-gauge plethysmography in the evaluation of the evolution of deep vein thrombosis of the legs].[应变计体积描记法在评估下肢深静脉血栓形成的演变中的应用]
Boll Soc Ital Biol Sper. 1984 Jul 31;60(7):1333-9.
6
[Changes of blood dynamics measured by vein impedance blood stream charts in pregnant women].[应用静脉阻抗血流图检测孕妇血液动力学变化]
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 1993 Oct;28(10):599-600, 635.
7
Alterations of occlusive cuff impedance plethysmography results in the obstetric patient.产科患者中阻塞性袖带阻抗体积描记法的改变。
Surgery. 1981 May;89(5):594-8.
8
[Comparative studies of the venous system of the arm and leg before and after delivery].[分娩前后手臂和腿部静脉系统的比较研究]
Z Geburtshilfe Perinatol. 1987 Nov-Dec;191(6):219-24.
9
A methodological study of computerized venous strain-gauge plethysmography of the upper extremities.
Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2005 Sep;25(5):281-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-097X.2005.00629.x.
10
Effect of varicose vein surgery on venous reflux scoring and plethysmographic assessment of venous function.静脉曲张手术对静脉反流评分及静脉功能体积描记评估的影响。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2008 Dec;36(6):731-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2008.06.017.