Suppr超能文献

如何研究正电子发射断层显像/计算机断层扫描(PET/CT)监测癌症治疗的最佳时机。

How to study optimal timing of PET/CT for monitoring of cancer treatment.

作者信息

Vach Werner, Høilund-Carlsen Poul Flemming, Fischer Barbara Malene, Gerke Oke, Weber Wolfgang

机构信息

Clinical Epidemiology, Institute of Medical Biometry and Medical Informatics, University Medical Center Freiburg Stefan-Meier-Str. 26, D-79104 Freiburg, Germany.

出版信息

Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2011;1(1):54-62. Epub 2011 Jul 20.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The use of PET/CT for monitoring treatment response in cancer patients after chemo- or radiotherapy is a very promising approach to optimize cancer treatment. However, the timing of the PET/CT-based evaluation of reduction in viable tumor tissue is a crucial question. We investigated how to plan and analyze studies to optimize this timing.

METHODS

General considerations about studying the optimal timing are given and four fundamental steps are illustrated using data from a published study.

RESULTS

The optimal timing should be examined by optimizing the schedule with respect to predicting the overall individual time course we can observe in the case of dense measurements. The optimal timing needs not to and should not be studied by optimizing the association with the prognosis of the patient.

CONCLUSIONS

The optimal timing should be examined in specific 'schedule optimizing studies'. These should be clearly distinguished from studies evaluating the prognostic value of a reduction in viable tumor tissue.

摘要

目的

使用正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描(PET/CT)监测癌症患者在化疗或放疗后的治疗反应,是优化癌症治疗的一种非常有前景的方法。然而,基于PET/CT评估存活肿瘤组织减少情况的时机是一个关键问题。我们研究了如何规划和分析研究以优化这一时机。

方法

给出了关于研究最佳时机的一般考虑因素,并使用一项已发表研究的数据说明了四个基本步骤。

结果

应通过优化时间表来检查最佳时机,以便预测在密集测量情况下我们能够观察到的个体总体时间进程。最佳时机不需要也不应该通过优化与患者预后的关联来研究。

结论

应在特定的“时间表优化研究”中检查最佳时机。这些研究应与评估存活肿瘤组织减少的预后价值的研究明确区分开来。

相似文献

1
How to study optimal timing of PET/CT for monitoring of cancer treatment.
Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2011;1(1):54-62. Epub 2011 Jul 20.
6
Sequential FDG-PET/CT reliably predicts response of locally advanced rectal cancer to neo-adjuvant chemo-radiation therapy.
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2007 Oct;34(10):1583-93. doi: 10.1007/s00259-007-0426-1. Epub 2007 May 15.
8
Salvage radiotherapy in prostate cancer patients. Planning, treatment response and prognosis using (11)C-choline PET/CT.
Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol. 2016 Jul-Aug;35(4):238-45. doi: 10.1016/j.remn.2015.11.007. Epub 2016 Jan 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Imaging Follow-Up of Nonsurgical Therapies for Lung Cancer: Expert Panel Narrative Review.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2023 Oct;221(4):409-424. doi: 10.2214/AJR.23.29104. Epub 2023 Apr 5.
2
A pilot study investigating the role of F-FDG-PET in the early identification of chemoradiotherapy response in anal cancer.
J Med Radiat Sci. 2022 Dec;69(4):439-447. doi: 10.1002/jmrs.611. Epub 2022 Jul 30.
3
Time interval between (chemo)radiotherapy and subsequent laryngectomy is not prognostic for post operative complications and survival.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2021 Jul;278(7):2511-2516. doi: 10.1007/s00405-020-06384-y. Epub 2020 Sep 29.
4
FDG-PET/CT for Response Monitoring in Metastatic Breast Cancer: Today, Tomorrow, and Beyond.
Cancers (Basel). 2019 Aug 15;11(8):1190. doi: 10.3390/cancers11081190.
5
PET/CT-Based Response Evaluation in Cancer-a Systematic Review of Design Issues.
Mol Imaging Biol. 2020 Feb;22(1):33-46. doi: 10.1007/s11307-019-01351-4.
6
A Review on Green Synthesis, Biomedical Applications, and Toxicity Studies of ZnO NPs.
Bioinorg Chem Appl. 2018 Aug 1;2018:3569758. doi: 10.1155/2018/3569758. eCollection 2018.
7
FDG PET/CT in cancer: comparison of actual use with literature-based recommendations.
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016 Apr;43(4):695-706. doi: 10.1007/s00259-015-3217-0. Epub 2015 Oct 30.
9
Positron emission tomography imaging of atherosclerosis.
Theranostics. 2013 Nov 2;3(11):894-902. doi: 10.7150/thno.5506.
10
Antibody-based imaging of HER-2: moving into the clinic.
Curr Mol Med. 2013 Dec;13(10):1523-37. doi: 10.2174/1566524013666131111120951.

本文引用的文献

1
PET/CT without capacity limitations: a Danish experience from a European perspective.
Eur Radiol. 2011 Jun;21(6):1277-85. doi: 10.1007/s00330-010-2025-y. Epub 2011 Jan 28.
2
From RECIST to PERCIST: Evolving Considerations for PET response criteria in solid tumors.
J Nucl Med. 2009 May;50 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):122S-50S. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.108.057307.
3
Role of 18F-FDG PET in assessment of response in non-small cell lung cancer.
J Nucl Med. 2009 May;50 Suppl 1:31S-42S. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.108.057216. Epub 2009 Apr 20.
4
Assessing tumor response to therapy.
J Nucl Med. 2009 May;50 Suppl 1:1S-10S. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.108.057174. Epub 2009 Apr 20.
5
Measuring response with FDG-PET: methodological aspects.
Oncologist. 2009 Apr;14(4):369-77. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2008-0119. Epub 2009 Apr 8.
6
Monitoring response to therapeutic interventions in patients with cancer.
Semin Nucl Med. 2009 May;39(3):210-32. doi: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2008.12.001.
7
New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1).
Eur J Cancer. 2009 Jan;45(2):228-47. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026.
8
Cancer clinical trial outcomes: any progress in tumour-size assessment?
Eur J Cancer. 2009 Jan;45(2):225-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.025. Epub 2008 Dec 8.
10
The role of FDG-PET scans in patients with lymphoma.
Blood. 2007 Nov 15;110(10):3507-16. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-06-097238. Epub 2007 Aug 20.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验