Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, Arlington, Virginia 22201, USA.
Traffic Inj Prev. 2012;13(6):585-91. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2012.676222.
Passenger cars often are at a disadvantage when colliding with light trucks (sport utility vehicles [SUVs] and pickups) due to differences in mass, vehicle structural alignment, and stiffness. In 2003, vehicle manufacturers agreed to voluntary measures to improve compatibility, especially in front-to-front and front-to-side crashes, with full adherence to be achieved by September 2009. This study examined whether fatality rates are consistent with the expected benefit of this agreement.
Analyses examined 2 death rates for 1- to 4-year-old passenger vehicles during 2000-2001 and 2008-2009 in the United States: occupant deaths per million registered vehicle years in these vehicles and deaths in other cars that collided with these vehicles in 2-vehicle crashes per million registered vehicle years. These rates were computed for each study period and for cars/minivans (referred to as cars), SUVs, and pickups by curb weight (in 500-pound increments). The latter death rate, referred to as the car crash partner death rate, also was computed for front-to-front crashes and front-to-side crashes where the front of the 1- to 4-year-old vehicle struck the side of the partner car.
In both study periods, occupant death rates generally decreased for each vehicle type both with increasing curb weight and over time. SUVs experienced the greatest declines compared with cars and pickups. This is due in part to the early fitment of electronic stability control in SUVs, which drastically reduced the incidence of single-vehicle rollover crashes. Pickups had the highest death rates in both study periods. Car crash partner death rates generally declined over time for all vehicle categories but more steeply for SUVs and pickups colliding with cars than for cars colliding with cars. In fact, the car crash partner death rates for SUVs and cars were nearly identical during 2008-2009, suggesting that the voluntary design changes for compatibility have been effective. Car crash partner death rates also declined for pickups, but their rates were consistently the highest in both study periods.
It is impossible to disentangle the individual contributions of the compatibility agreement, improved crashworthiness of cars, and other factors in reducing car crash partner fatality rates. However, the generally larger reductions in car crash partner death rates for SUVs and pickups indicate the likely benefits of the agreement. Overall, this study finds that the system of regulatory testing, voluntary industry initiatives, and consumer information testing has led to a passenger vehicle fleet that is much more compatible in crashes.
由于质量、车辆结构对准和刚度的差异,乘用车在与轻型卡车(运动型多用途车[SUV]和皮卡)碰撞时往往处于劣势。2003 年,汽车制造商同意采取自愿措施提高兼容性,特别是在前对前和前对侧碰撞中,并计划于 2009 年 9 月全面实施。本研究检验了这一协议的预期效益是否与死亡率一致。
分析检查了美国 2000-2001 年和 2008-2009 年期间 1 至 4 岁乘用车的 2 项死亡率:这些车辆每百万注册车辆年的乘员死亡率,以及在 2 辆汽车碰撞中与这些车辆碰撞的其他汽车的死亡率每百万注册车辆年。在每个研究期内,按车辆类型(乘用车、SUV 和皮卡)和整备质量(以 500 磅为增量)计算这些死亡率。后一个死亡率,称为汽车碰撞伙伴死亡率,也适用于正面碰撞和正面碰撞侧面碰撞,其中 1 至 4 岁车辆的前部撞击到伙伴车的侧面。
在两个研究期内,随着整备质量的增加和时间的推移,每种车辆类型的乘员死亡率普遍下降。与乘用车和皮卡车相比,SUV 的降幅最大。这部分是由于 SUV 早期配备了电子稳定控制系统,大大减少了单辆汽车翻车事故的发生。在两个研究期内,皮卡车的死亡率均最高。随着时间的推移,所有车辆类别的汽车碰撞伙伴死亡率普遍下降,但 SUV 和皮卡与汽车碰撞的汽车碰撞伙伴死亡率下降更为陡峭,而汽车与汽车碰撞的汽车碰撞伙伴死亡率下降则较为平缓。事实上,2008-2009 年期间,SUV 和汽车的汽车碰撞伙伴死亡率几乎相同,表明兼容性设计的自愿改变是有效的。皮卡的汽车碰撞伙伴死亡率也有所下降,但在两个研究期内,其死亡率始终最高。
不可能将兼容性协议、汽车耐撞性的提高以及其他降低汽车碰撞伙伴死亡率的因素分开。然而,SUV 和皮卡的汽车碰撞伙伴死亡率普遍较大幅度的降低表明了协议的可能益处。总的来说,本研究发现,监管测试、自愿的行业倡议和消费者信息测试的系统导致了更兼容的乘用车车队。