National Data Bank for Rheumatic Diseases and University of Kansas School of Medicine, Wichita, KS, USA.
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2012 Nov-Dec;30(6 Suppl 74):88-93. Epub 2012 Dec 14.
It has been proposed that fibromyalgia can be understood as a disorder of central sensitisation and dysregulation (CD) and that characteristic somatic symptoms are the result of 'central augmentation'. We examined this hypothesis by analysing sensory and non-sensory variables in the context of the updated (2010) American College of Rheumatology definition of fibromyalgia and the fibromyalgianess (polysymptomatic distress) scale.
We studied 11,288 patients, including those with fibromyalgia, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and osteoarthritis (OA). We divided somatic symptoms into sensory (hearing difficulties) and evaluative (easy bruising and hair loss) non-sensory symptoms, and included a non-symptom that was neutral as to psychological content or meaning (influenza vaccination). Data were analysed by logistic regression and adjusted for age and sex.
Fibromyalgia patients reported more sensory and non-sensory symptoms than patients with RA and OA, but not more non-symptoms. At all levels of fibromyalgianess (or fibromyalgia intensity) the probability of sensory and non-sensory symptoms was similar across all rheumatic diseases, and this association occurred in FM criteria (+) and criteria (-) patients. No association was noted with the non-symptom control question.
While the CD hypothesis is consistent with hearing problems in fibromyalgia, there is no medical explanation for the evaluative symptoms of hair loss and bruising being increased. The associations between fibromyalgia/fibromyalgianess and evaluative (not sensory) symptoms must occur through mechanisms other than central sensitization and augmentation, and are consistent with over-reporting that has a psychological basis. However, augmentation of sensory symptoms does not preclude simultaneous over-reporting.
有人提出,纤维肌痛可被理解为一种中枢敏化和失调(CD)障碍,其特征性躯体症状是“中枢放大”的结果。我们通过分析在纤维肌痛的更新(2010 年)美国风湿病学会定义和纤维肌痛样(多症状困扰)量表的背景下的感觉和非感觉变量来检验这一假说。
我们研究了 11288 例患者,包括纤维肌痛、类风湿关节炎(RA)和骨关节炎(OA)患者。我们将躯体症状分为感觉(听力困难)和评估(容易瘀伤和脱发)非感觉症状,并包括一个对心理内容或意义呈中性的非症状(流感疫苗接种)。数据分析采用逻辑回归,并根据年龄和性别进行调整。
纤维肌痛患者报告的感觉和非感觉症状多于 RA 和 OA 患者,但非症状报告较少。在所有纤维肌痛样(或纤维肌痛强度)水平上,所有风湿病疾病的感觉和非感觉症状的可能性相似,这种关联发生在 FM 标准(+)和标准(-)患者中。与非症状对照问题无关。
虽然 CD 假说与纤维肌痛的听力问题一致,但脱发和瘀伤的评估症状增加没有医学解释。纤维肌痛/纤维肌痛样与评估(非感觉)症状之间的关联必须通过除中枢敏化和放大之外的机制发生,并且与具有心理基础的过度报告一致。然而,感觉症状的放大并不排除同时的过度报告。