Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Gülhane Military Medical Academy, Haydarpaşa Training Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey.
Clin Rheumatol. 2013 Mar;32(3):309-15. doi: 10.1007/s10067-012-2112-3. Epub 2012 Nov 9.
The objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that dry needling is more effective than sham dry needling in the treatment of myofascial pain syndrome (MPS). This was a prospective, double-blinded, randomized-controlled study conducted in an outpatient clinic. Thirty-nine subjects with established myofascial trigger points were randomized into two groups: study group (N = 22) and placebo group (N = 17). Dry needling was applied using acupuncture needles, and sham dry needling was applied in the placebo group. The treatment was composed of six sessions which were performed in 4 weeks; the first four sessions were performed twice a week (for 2 weeks) and the last two, once a week (for 2 weeks). The visual analog scale (VAS) and Short Form-36 (SF-36) were used. When compared with the initial values, VAS scores of the dry needling group following the first and sixth sessions were significantly lower (p = 0.000 and p < 0.000, respectively). When VAS scores were compared between the groups, the first assessment scores were found to be similar, but the second and third assessment scores were found to be significantly lower in the dry needling group (p = 0.034 and p < 0.001, respectively). When SF-36 scores of the groups were compared, both the physical and mental component scores were found to be significantly increased in the dry needling group, whereas only those of vitality scores were found to be increased significantly in the placebo (sham needling) group. The present study shows that the dry needling treatment is effective in relieving the pain and in improving the quality of life of patients with MPS.
本研究旨在验证干针疗法比假干针疗法更能有效治疗肌筋膜疼痛综合征(MPS)的假设。这是一项前瞻性、双盲、随机对照研究,在一家门诊诊所进行。39 名患有明确肌筋膜触发点的患者被随机分为两组:研究组(n=22)和安慰剂组(n=17)。干针治疗采用针灸针进行,安慰剂组则进行假干针治疗。治疗包括六次疗程,在四周内完成;前四次疗程每两周进行两次(共两周),后两次每两周进行一次(共两周)。使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)和简化 36 项健康调查量表(SF-36)进行评估。与初始值相比,干针组在第一次和第六次治疗后 VAS 评分显著降低(p=0.000 和 p<0.000)。当两组的 VAS 评分进行比较时,首次评估评分相似,但第二次和第三次评估评分在干针组显著较低(p=0.034 和 p<0.001)。当比较两组的 SF-36 评分时,干针组的生理和心理组成分均显著增加,而安慰剂组(假干针)仅发现活力评分显著增加。本研究表明,干针治疗可有效缓解 MPS 患者的疼痛并改善其生活质量。
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2013-9
Clin Rheumatol. 2014-6
Front Neurol. 2024-10-9
Sports (Basel). 2024-6-5
J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2023-9
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2009-12-18
Med Clin North Am. 2007-3
Photomed Laser Surg. 2004-8