Hadizadeh Monavar, Rahimi Abbas, Velayati Meysam, Javaherian Mohammad, Naderi Farokh, Keshtkar Abbasali, Dommerholt Jan
Department of Physiotherapy, School of Rehabilitation, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, # Damavand Ave, Tehran, 16169-13111, Iran.
Department of Radiology, Akhtar Orthopedic Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Chiropr Man Therap. 2025 Apr 14;33(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s12998-024-00567-8.
The most common cause of muscle pain is myofascial pain syndrome. Myofascial pain syndrome caused by sensitive areas called trigger points (TrP). Some physiotherapy modalities have acceptable effects for this disorder, but it is necessary to check the effects of placebo, appropriate dose, and long-term effects for each intervention. The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of intramuscular electrical stimulation (IMES) compared to dry needling (DN) on sonographic and clinical parameters in upper trapezius muscle TrP.
This is a randomized, single-blind control trial. The study period was from December 2, 2020, to April 10, 2021. Thirty volunteer patients with active upper trapezius TrP were randomly allocated into two groups: (1) IMES, (2) DN. Participants received interventions in three sessions. Primary outcome measurements were neck range of motion (ROM) and TrP circumference. Secondary outcome measurements were pain by visual analog scale (VAS), pain pressure threshold (PPT), disability, TrP longitudinal and transverse diameter, TrP stiffness, and muscle blood flow by vascular resistance index (RI). All outcome measurements were evaluated before, after, and one month after the intervention. If the data were normal, the repeated measure ANOVA test was used; if data were not normal, the Friedman test and the Kruskal-Wallis test was used. A significance level of 0.05 has considered.
ROM increment was significantly more in the IMES group. TrP circumference decrement was significantly more in the IMES group. VAS changes did not show significant difference between two groups. The PPT improvement was significantly more in the IMES group. Disability changes were not significant. Longitudinal diameter changes were significantly more in the IMES group. TrP stiffness changes were not significant. The vascular RI decreased significantly in IMES group.
It seems that both IMES and DN have promising effects for improving upper trapezius TrPs. However, IMES is more effective in some clinical and ultrasound parameters. In order to investigate the effects of this intervention more precisely more studies are necessary.
This study was prospectively registered at Iranian registry of clinical trials (IRCT: IRCT20170616034567N2).
肌肉疼痛最常见的原因是肌筋膜疼痛综合征。肌筋膜疼痛综合征由称为触发点(TrP)的敏感区域引起。一些物理治疗方法对这种疾病有可接受的效果,但有必要检查每种干预措施的安慰剂效应、适当剂量和长期效果。本研究的目的是比较肌内电刺激(IMES)与干针疗法(DN)对上斜方肌触发点的超声和临床参数的影响。
这是一项随机、单盲对照试验。研究期间为2020年12月2日至2021年4月10日。30名患有活动性上斜方肌触发点的志愿者患者被随机分为两组:(1)肌内电刺激组,(2)干针疗法组。参与者接受三次干预。主要结局指标为颈部活动范围(ROM)和触发点周长。次要结局指标为视觉模拟量表(VAS)疼痛评分、疼痛压力阈值(PPT)、功能障碍、触发点纵径和横径、触发点硬度以及通过血管阻力指数(RI)评估的肌肉血流量。所有结局指标在干预前、干预后和干预后一个月进行评估。如果数据呈正态分布,则使用重复测量方差分析检验;如果数据不呈正态分布,则使用弗里德曼检验和克鲁斯卡尔 - 沃利斯检验。显著性水平设定为0.05。
肌内电刺激组的ROM增加更为显著。肌内电刺激组的触发点周长减小更为显著。两组之间的VAS变化无显著差异。肌内电刺激组的PPT改善更为显著。功能障碍变化不显著。肌内电刺激组的纵径变化更为显著。触发点硬度变化不显著。肌内电刺激组的血管RI显著降低。
似乎肌内电刺激和干针疗法对改善上斜方肌触发点都有显著效果。然而,肌内电刺激在一些临床和超声参数方面更有效。为了更精确地研究这种干预措施的效果,还需要更多的研究。
本研究已在伊朗临床试验注册中心前瞻性注册(IRCT:IRCT20170616034567N2)。