Rajendra Prasad B, Sharma S M, Thomas S, Sabastian Paul, Aashal Sanghvi
Dept. of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, A B Shetty Memorial Institute of Dental Sciences, Mangalore, India.
J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2009 Sep;8(3):224-9. doi: 10.1007/s12663-009-0055-2. Epub 2009 Nov 21.
To compare shoulder function with respect to pain and disability in patients who have undergone nerve sparing neck dissection i.e. selective neck dissection (levels I, II, III) and functional neck dissection as a part of their treatment modality for carcinoma tongue on a follow up of minimum six months.
A total of 100 patients were selected for this study. 50 patients who had undergone selective neck dissection (levels I, II, III) and 50 who underwent functional neck dissection as a part of their treatment modality for squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue from January 2005 to January 2007 were asked to participate in this study. A standardized questionnaire was used to assess pain and disability. Pain and disability scores were then compared between the two nerve sparing dissections.
100% of the patients in Selective Neck Dissection (SND) (levels I, II, III) group and in Functional Neck Dissection (FND) groups complained of pain. Though there is pain present in both the treatment groups, no significant difference in the pain values was found between FND and SND (levels I, II, III) in any of the pain parameters. Disability was present in both the treatment groups. However patients who have undergone FND had significantly higher severity of disability when compared to SND (levels I, II, III) especially during activities which involve shoulder abduction like dressing, doing heavy household work, hair wash and washing clothes/dishes (5.18, 5.22, 5.5, 4.88 in FND and 2.26, 4.08, 4.58, 2.2 in SND (levels I, II, III) respectively. Disability perceived during other activities like doing heavy household and facial care was 2.08 and 1.84 in both the treatment groups respectively.
Degree of shoulder morbidity is much higher in patients who have undergone FND as compared to SND (levels I, II, III) as a treatment modality for carcinoma tongue, even though both the treatment options are nerve preserving.
对接受保留神经颈清扫术(即选择性颈清扫术(Ⅰ、Ⅱ、Ⅲ区))和功能性颈清扫术的患者,在至少随访6个月时,就疼痛和功能障碍方面比较其肩部功能,这些患者将上述手术作为舌癌治疗方式的一部分。
本研究共选取100例患者。选取2005年1月至2007年1月期间,50例行选择性颈清扫术(Ⅰ、Ⅱ、Ⅲ区)的患者和50例行功能性颈清扫术的患者,将其作为舌鳞状细胞癌治疗方式的一部分,并邀请他们参与本研究。使用标准化问卷评估疼痛和功能障碍情况。然后比较两种保留神经清扫术之间的疼痛和功能障碍评分。
选择性颈清扫术(Ⅰ、Ⅱ、Ⅲ区)组和功能性颈清扫术组的患者均有100%主诉疼痛。尽管两个治疗组均存在疼痛,但在任何疼痛参数方面,功能性颈清扫术组和选择性颈清扫术(Ⅰ、Ⅱ、Ⅲ区)组之间的疼痛值均未发现显著差异。两个治疗组均存在功能障碍。然而,与选择性颈清扫术(Ⅰ、Ⅱ、Ⅲ区)组相比,接受功能性颈清扫术的患者功能障碍严重程度明显更高,尤其是在涉及肩部外展的活动中,如穿衣、做繁重家务、洗头和洗衣服/洗碗(功能性颈清扫术组分别为5.18、5.22、5.5、4.88,选择性颈清扫术(Ⅰ、Ⅱ、Ⅲ区)组分别为2.26、4.08、4.58,、2.2)。在做繁重家务和面部护理等其他活动中,两个治疗组的功能障碍感知分别为2.08和1.84。
作为舌癌的一种治疗方式,与选择性颈清扫术(Ⅰ、Ⅱ、Ⅲ区)相比,接受功能性颈清扫术的患者肩部发病率更高,尽管两种治疗方案均保留神经。