Suppr超能文献

利用行政健康数据描述澳大利亚新南威尔士州的结直肠癌和肺癌护理:一项验证研究。

Using administrative health data to describe colorectal and lung cancer care in New South Wales, Australia: a validation study.

机构信息

Cancer Research Division, Cancer Council NSW, PO Box 572, Kings Cross, NSW 1340, Australia.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Nov 9;12:387. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-387.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Monitoring treatment patterns is crucial to improving cancer patient care. Our aim was to determine the accuracy of linked routinely collected administrative health data for monitoring colorectal and lung cancer care in New South Wales (NSW), Australia.

METHODS

Colorectal and lung cancer cases diagnosed in NSW between 2000 and 2002 were identified from the NSW Central Cancer Registry (CCR) and linked to their hospital discharge records in the NSW Admitted Patient Data Collection (APDC). These records were then linked to data from two relevant population-based patterns of care surveys. The main outcome measures were the sensitivity and specificity of data from the CCR and APDC for disease staging, investigative procedures, curative surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and selected comorbidities.

RESULTS

Data for 2917 colorectal and 1580 lung cancer cases were analysed. Unknown disease stage was more common for lung cancer in the administrative data (18%) than in the survey (2%). Colonoscopies were captured reasonably accurately in the administrative data compared with the surveys (82% and 79% respectively; 91% sensitivity, 53% specificity) but all other colorectal or lung cancer diagnostic procedures were under-enumerated. Ninety-one percent of colorectal cancer cases had potentially curative surgery recorded in the administrative data compared to 95% in the survey (96% sensitivity, 92% specificity), with similar accuracy for lung cancer (16% and 17%; 92% sensitivity, 99% specificity). Chemotherapy (~40% sensitivity) and radiotherapy (sensitivity≤30%) were vastly under-enumerated in the administrative data. The only comorbidity that was recorded reasonably accurately in the administrative data was diabetes.

CONCLUSIONS

Linked routinely collected administrative health data provided reasonably accurate information on potentially curative surgical treatment, colonoscopies and comorbidities such as diabetes. Other diagnostic procedures, comorbidities, chemotherapy and radiotherapy were not well enumerated in the administrative data. Other sources of data will be required to comprehensively monitor the primary management of cancer patients.

摘要

背景

监测治疗模式对于改善癌症患者的护理至关重要。我们的目的是确定在澳大利亚新南威尔士州(新州)使用链接的常规收集的行政健康数据监测结直肠癌和肺癌治疗的准确性。

方法

从新州中央癌症登记处(CCR)确定 2000 年至 2002 年间在新州诊断的结直肠癌和肺癌病例,并将其与新州住院患者数据采集(APDC)中的住院记录相链接。然后将这些记录与两项相关的基于人群的治疗模式调查的数据相链接。主要结局指标是 CCR 和 APDC 数据在疾病分期、检查程序、根治性手术、化疗、放疗和选定合并症方面的敏感性和特异性。

结果

对 2917 例结直肠癌和 1580 例肺癌病例的数据进行了分析。在行政数据中,肺癌的未知疾病分期比调查中更常见(18%对 2%)。与调查相比,行政数据中结直肠镜检查的记录相对准确(分别为 82%和 79%;91%的敏感性,53%的特异性),但所有其他结直肠或肺癌诊断程序的记录都不足。与调查(96%的敏感性,92%的特异性)相比,91%的结直肠癌病例在行政数据中记录了潜在的根治性手术(96%的敏感性,92%的特异性),肺癌的准确性相似(16%和 17%;92%的敏感性,99%的特异性)。化疗(约 40%的敏感性)和放疗(敏感性≤30%)在行政数据中严重记录不足。行政数据中记录相对准确的唯一合并症是糖尿病。

结论

链接的常规收集的行政健康数据提供了关于潜在的根治性手术治疗、结肠镜检查和合并症(如糖尿病)的合理准确信息。其他诊断程序、合并症、化疗和放疗在行政数据中没有得到很好的记录。需要其他数据源来全面监测癌症患者的主要治疗情况。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d90/3512511/2ab519ea6ac5/1472-6963-12-387-1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验