University of Cambridge Metabolic Research Laboratories, Institute of Metabolic Science, Level 4, Box 289, Addenbrooke's Treatment Centre, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK.
Cell Metab. 2012 Nov 7;16(5):665-71. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2012.10.008.
In this study we investigated the relationship between activity and energy expenditure (EE) in mice. By determining the relationship between activity and EE over a 24 hr period in an individual mouse, activity was calculated to account for 26.6% ± 1.1% of total EE at 30°C. However, when comparing across multiple mice, only 9.53% ± 1.1% of EE from activity appeared to be independent of other components involved in the thermogenic response, suggesting other metabolic processes may mask the contribution of activity to EE. In line with this concept, below thermoneutrality mice still expended a substantial amount of energy on activity; however, at 24°C, 20°C, or 5°C, no independent effect of EE from activity on total daily EE could be detected. Overall these results suggest that when studying mice at temperatures below thermoneutrality, activity is unlikely to explain differences in EE between groups of animals.
在这项研究中,我们调查了小鼠活动与能量消耗(EE)之间的关系。通过确定单个小鼠在 24 小时内活动与 EE 之间的关系,在 30°C 时,活动占总 EE 的 26.6%±1.1%。然而,当比较多个小鼠时,只有 9.53%±1.1%的 EE 来自于与发热反应相关的其他组成部分以外的活动,这表明其他代谢过程可能掩盖了活动对 EE 的贡献。与这一概念一致的是,在体温中性范围内,小鼠仍然会在活动上消耗大量的能量;然而,在 24°C、20°C 或 5°C 时,无法检测到活动产生的 EE 对总日 EE 的独立影响。总的来说,这些结果表明,当在低于体温中性的温度下研究小鼠时,活动不太可能解释动物群体之间 EE 的差异。